NOAA Chief Scientist Probing Whether ‘Political’ Statement Violated Ethics Code

MIAMI, FL - AUGUST 29: The logo of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is seen at the Nation Hurricane Center on August 29, 2019 in Miami, Florida. (Photo by Eva Marie Uzcategui/Getty Images)
MIAMI, FL - AUGUST 29: The logo of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is seen at the Nation Hurricane Center on August 29, 2019 in Miami, Florida. Hurricane Dorian is expected to become a Category... MIAMI, FL - AUGUST 29: The logo of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is seen at the Nation Hurricane Center on August 29, 2019 in Miami, Florida. Hurricane Dorian is expected to become a Category 4 as it approaches Florida in the upcoming days. (Photo by Eva Marie Uzcategui/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Craig McLean, acting chief scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), is investigating whether a statement put out by his agency backing up President Donald Trump’s deluded claims about Alabama potentially being impacted by Hurricane Dorian was an ethical breach.

According to the Washington Post, McLean called the statement, which admonished the Birmingham branch of the agency for contradicting the President’s incorrect forecast, “political.”

“The content of this press release is very concerning as it compromises the ability of NOAA to convey life-saving information necessary to avoid substantial and specific danger to public health and safety,” he added in an email obtained by the Post. “If the public cannot trust our information, or we debase our forecaster’s warnings and products, that specific danger arises.”

The unsigned NOAA statement, posted on Friday, sent more shockwaves through the now days-long story, which included the President seemingly altering a map of Hurricane Dorian with a Sharpie to undergird his incorrect conviction that Alabama was in the path of danger.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. The investigation will conclude that there’s nothing to see here, everything was on the up-and-up, and the Birmingham folks were incorrect to correct the record.

  2. The Trump presidency is so fucked up in every aspect.

  3. Avatar for ghost ghost says:

    Goodbye, Mr. McLean, it was good to know you. Thanks for trying. At least you should be able to find a good job in the private sector.

    (McLean is a career scientist and lawyer who has worked for NOAA for nearly 30 years and was first promoted to head the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research by the Obama administration. https://www.noaa.gov/media-release/craig-mclean-named-new-leader-for-noaa-research)

  4. ‘ETHICS’? You’re asking us to believe that you guys care about ‘ethics’? WTF? You pretended that the POTUS somehow did NOT have access to the most CURRENT information and somehow had to rely on 4-day old projections put out by media. And now you’re going ‘probe’?

  5. At least there’s one senior executive at NOAA with balls.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

71 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for fgs Avatar for bryan Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for voreason Avatar for yskov Avatar for drriddle Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for lastroth Avatar for boidster Avatar for keninmn Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for tibetancowboy Avatar for schmed Avatar for benthere Avatar for jinnj Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for noonm Avatar for asturcot Avatar for jrw Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for paul_lukasiak Avatar for rucleare Avatar for randome

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: