‘Mutually Assured Destruction’: McConnell, WH Privately At Odds Over Senate Trial

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 03: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) answers questions during a press conference following a weekly policy lunch at the U.S. Capitol on December 03, 2019 in Washington, DC. McCo... WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 03: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) answers questions during a press conference following a weekly policy lunch at the U.S. Capitol on December 03, 2019 in Washington, DC. McConnell answered a range of questions related primarily to the ongoing impeachment proceedings against U.S. President Donald Trump, and continued funding of the federal government. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Trump has publicly and privately offered conflicting signals about what he wants out of a Senate impeachment trial, stating in public that he would be open to something short or long. In private, he has told aides he’d like the ability to call witnesses on his behalf, the Wall Street Journal reported. 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and White House aides are reportedly trying to convince the President that a quick acquittal is the best route to take. But Trump is convinced that a longer trial might give him the opportunity to expose the whistleblower whose initial report on his call with Ukraine launched the impeachment inquiry. That thinking is at odds with what McConnell has privately expressed.

According to the WSJ, in a meeting with Senate Republicans last week, McConnell thinks bringing in witnesses would be a mistake, both because it would prolong proceedings but also might complicate Senate Republicans reelection efforts.

“Mutually assured destruction,” Mr. McConnell told his colleagues.

Republican senators are wary of ignoring Trump’s wishes, but the majority of those who spoke to WSJ said allowing witnesses to speak, and possibly reveal new information, might make it more difficult to acquit Trump.

While privately McConnell may have concerns, publicly he’s painted a picture of uniformity. During an appearance on Fox News last week, McConnell explicitly said the Senate would deliver whatever the White House wanted for the impeachment trial.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. They are both wallowing in the bottomless depths of EVIL.

    They connect on that.

  2. “Mutually assured destruction,” Mr. McConnell told his colleagues.

    #DitchMoscowMitch could only be so lucky.

  3. So… Trump’s single-minded desire for revenge (and the ensuing potential for violence-by-proxy by exposing the whistleblower through testimony in a Senate trial) may derail McConnell’s careful plotting of a quick and predetermined acquittal devoid of the annoyances of evidence and witnesses.

    Hmmmm…

  4. “…allowing witnesses to speak, and possibly reveal new information, might make it more difficult to acquit Trump.”

    Oh please, there’s not one damned thing any witness can say, or any combination of witnesses can say, that is going to flip 20 GOP Senators. For McConnell or any GOP official to express fear acquittal is in doubt, under any circumstances, is monumentally disingenuous.

  5. Avatar for jmacaz jmacaz says:

    tRump is right… his only possible avenue to removal is witnesses. SADLY he does not understand what removal means

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

167 more replies

Participants

Avatar for sedonaz Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for daveminnj Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for clemmers Avatar for cervantes Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for becca656 Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for danny Avatar for careysub Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for spin Avatar for erik_t Avatar for bwillator Avatar for jwbuho Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for paul_lukasiak Avatar for filmknight Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for scabbysanta Avatar for WayOutWest

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: