McConnell Says National Abortion Ban ‘Possible,’ Wouldn’t Change Filibuster To Do It

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 26: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) departs a news conference following the Senate Republican policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on April 26, 2022 in Washington, DC. McConnell wa... WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 26: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) departs a news conference following the Senate Republican policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on April 26, 2022 in Washington, DC. McConnell was asked about Billionaire Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter and he said, "We're all watching with a great deal of interest because there have been our share of complaints about the way it's been running." (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said in an interview with a reporter for USA Today that, should the leaked SCOTUS opinion become the Court’s final ruling, a national abortion ban would be “possible.”

“All of this puts the cart before the horse,” he said, when pressed by the reporter on whether the Senate would entertain a federal ban.

“If the leaked opinion became the final opinion, legislative bodies — not only at the state level but at the federal level — certainly could legislate in that area,” McConnell said, according to USA Today.

“And if this were the final decision, that was the point that it should be resolved one way or another in the legislative process,” he added. “So yeah, it’s possible. It would depend on where the votes were.”

A segment of the anti-abortion movement sees a federal ban as the next step in its push to restrict abortion nationwide.

But, the Senate minority leader said, he would not create a carveout to the filibuster to pass such a ban. That would suggest — if the minority leader were to stick to that pledge — that a ban would require 60 votes in the Senate.

“No carveout of the filibuster — period,” he told USA Today. “For any subject.” 

Some Democrats have contemplated the idea of a filibuster carveout for abortion, which they would seek to use to pass a law protecting the right — often referred to as a codification of Roe. Such a law would likely make use of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which gives the federal government the authority to make laws regulating a range of activity between the states.

The current, ultraconservative Supreme Court might strike down such an interpretation of the Commerce Clause.

But, if it upheld it, Republicans would also be able to use a similar interpretation to ban abortion nationwide next time they win control of the White House.

At the moment, Democrats do not have the 50 votes needed for either a filibuster carveout on abortion or for a law codifying Roe.

Republicans have largely sought to avoid commenting on the implications of the Supreme Court striking down Roe — an ironic political posture given that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s draft is seemingly a big win for a movement whose votes Republicans have long courted.

Yet GOP senators have indicated an awareness that they will soon come under tremendous pressure to push the envelope further on abortion.

“If the court does in fact overturn Roe v. Wade, that doesn’t mean Roe is immediately illegal across the country,” Sen. Ted Cruz said during a Fox Business interview last week, adding: “In bright blue states, at least in the short term, it is certain that abortion will remain universally available on demand.”

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. McConnell Says National Abortion Ban ‘Possible,’ Wouldn’t Change Filibuster To Do It

    …and we should believe him? Why?

  2. He’'s lying.

    The split second the GOP gets the trifecta back–Senate, House & Presidency the filibuster will be killed and not only will abortion be banned so will any form of birth control. And all of that will be sanctified by the six radicals on the corrupted court.

  3. Use this.
    But not only abortion, make it clear right from the start the threat is broad.

    Tie it up with other GOP statements, to fully exploit GOP candidates own words, blow it up to the national level, as in
    GOP candidate in Arizona anti-birth control
    and kooky Sen. Blackburn of Tenn. statements only married couples should have access to contraception.

    Sure it will be “nut-picking” but Republicans have shown if you run with this hard and repeated (picking nuts on the Left side to back-foot Dems), it can work, and change the dynamic of mid-terms up-and-down the ticket. Do not think only national races.

    Don’t make this just abortion about which many people are conflicted, show how broad the risk is and make GOP own that so JoeSixPack and Co understand their rubbers access is at risk too. Broad threats are more mobilising.

    Privacy to do what you want at home is at risk from the Theocrats, for reals. This can be brought home but go Wide and Big, make it clear it’s not just the narrow subject, make it Radical Reactionary - not conservative, Radical Reactionary. (it is of course)

  4. McConnell will ditch the filibuster the second it’s inconvenient for him to keep it. I’m not so sure he would be on board killing abortion rights nationwide unless it benefitted him personally. As always with MoscowMitch, follow the money and power.

  5. “No carveout of the filibuster — period,” he told USA Today. “For any subject.”

    Until it suits his craven political purposes.

Continue the discussion at

540 more replies


Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for globalguy Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for becca656 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for justruss Avatar for glowgirl Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for garrybee Avatar for osprey Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for old_guru Avatar for iafixture

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: