Manhattan DA Shows Renewed Interest In Stormy Daniels Hush Payments

District Attorney Alvin Bragg speaks at a press conference to discuss the charges against Steve Bannon in New York on September 8, 2022. - Bannon, 68, Donald Trump's former advisor, was indicted on state charges of m... District Attorney Alvin Bragg speaks at a press conference to discuss the charges against Steve Bannon in New York on September 8, 2022. - Bannon, 68, Donald Trump's former advisor, was indicted on state charges of money laundering, conspiracy and fraud related to an alleged online scheme to raise money for the construction of the US-Mexico border wall. (Photo by Alex Kent / AFP) (Photo by ALEX KENT/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Manhattan district attorney’s office is seeking to move forward in its criminal investigation into Donald Trump through a familiar lens: Stormy Daniels.

According to the New York Times, District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg is focusing on the hush money payments the former president made to Daniels, a former porn actress, to keep her quiet about an alleged affair she had with Trump.

There have been countless Trump scandals since news of the alleged affair first became public during his presidency, so as a refresher: Daniels and Trump allegedly had an affair in 2006, but Trump has never acknowledged it. His team, however, took steps to ensure it didn’t become public in the months leading up to the 2016 election: Trump’s former fixer Michael Cohen allegedly arranged to pay Daniels $130,000 to sign a non-disclosure agreement barring her from discussing the affair in the media. 

Cohen later pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations surrounding the arrangement in 2018 and was sentenced to three years in prison, which he’s currently serving under house arrest. Trump still denies the affair.

Legal experts have since pushed for the Manhattan DA’s office to use Daniels’ case to prosecute Trump, but it didn’t go anywhere. The office shifted its attention toward Trump’s broader business practices.

But for the first time since he took office in January, Bragg is reportedly taking a step in the direction of the hush money payment.

According to the Times, attorneys in Bragg’s office are turning their attention to Allen H. Weisselberg, the former chief financial officer for the Trump Organization who’d testified last week against the company for tax crimes. 

Weisselberg allegedly has direct knowledge of the hush-money payment, so attorneys are reportedly weighing bringing charges against Weisselberg to reportedly pressure the longtime Trump ally to cooperate.

The revelation comes amid a burgeoning storm of renewed federal inquiries into Trump: On Friday, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel to oversee progress on two separate criminal probes into Trump’s role in the events surrounding the January 6th insurrection and whether hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort violated federal law.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Well. That didn’t take long. After all, Cohen was convicted and sentenced in 2018, after cooperating with prosecutors and producing checks signed by Donald Fucking Trump, Donald Fucking Trump Jr., and Allen Fucking Weisselberg.

  2. Weisselberg allegedly has direct knowledge of the hush-money payment, so attorneys are reportedly weighing bringing charges against Weisselberg to reportedly pressure the longtime Trump ally to cooperate.

    Because that worked so well the last time. :roll_eyes: And what’s the proposed criminal charge, some piddly improper tax deduction?

  3. Look, I may seem jaded, but I am all for prosecutions that will lay bare extorting Ukraine and fomenting insurrection – things that will expose Trump’s crimes as front man for a complicit GOP political apparatus.

    Stormy Daniels hush payments, titillating and prurient as they are, make the focus the man himself.

    I fear Mitch McConnell reads headlines like this and has a tiny turtlegasm.

  4. :joy:

  5. So, if I understand this correctly, the person who signed the check and the person who delivered it are tried as criminals but the person who actually had the affair and authorized and provided money for a hush money payment skates. Am I missing something that would make this make sense?

    Oh, and BTW, first.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

95 more replies

Participants

Avatar for runfastandwin Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for mch Avatar for lastroth Avatar for jeffs Avatar for darcy Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for dave_mb Avatar for ted Avatar for blaneyboy324 Avatar for edhedh Avatar for news247 Avatar for brian512 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for rhs1963 Avatar for socalista Avatar for texastoast Avatar for 19tibekius6 Avatar for joanmariet Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for carpe_diem Avatar for IBecameACitizenforthis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: