No Surprise: Jim Jordan Backs Up Trump On His Tweets Attacking Yovanovitch

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: Republican Representative from Ohio Jim Jordan questions Charge d'Affaires at the US embassy in Ukraine Bill Taylor during the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on... WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: Republican Representative from Ohio Jim Jordan questions Charge d'Affaires at the US embassy in Ukraine Bill Taylor during the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on the impeachment inquiry into US President Donald J. Trump, on Capitol Hill November 13, 2019 in Washington, DC. In the first public impeachment hearings in more than two decades, House Democrats are trying to build a case that President Donald Trump committed extortion, bribery or coercion by trying to enlist Ukraine to investigate his political rival in exchange for military aide and a White House meeting that Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky sought with Trump. (Photo by Jim Lo Scalzo-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), predictably, doesn’t think President Trump’s tweets bashing ousted Ukraine ambassador Marie Yovanovitch in the midst of her public hearing are a big deal.

According to CNN Friday, Jordan blamed Trump’s attacks against Yovanovitch on his frustration with Democrats. Earlier Friday, Trump lashed out in his tweets targeting the ousted Ukraine ambassador, saying “everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad” and that it is a President’s “absolute right” to appoint ambassadors. The President’s tweets were swiftly met with a wave of backlash.

Jordan thought the American people could relate to Trump’s indignation.

“Look, the President has been frustrated with this relentless attack on him by the Democrats that started even before he was President. I think the American people can relate to the frustration,” Jordan said, according to CNN. “Democrats started in July 2016 with their crazy investigation and now they move into this, so I think that’s what drives that.”

Jordan also argued that Trump did not commit witness tampering with his tweets. Notably, Fox News anchors Bret Baier and Chris Wallace argued that Trump may have done just that with his attacks.

“The witness is testifying. She wouldn’t even know about the quote if Mr. Schiff hadn’t read the tweet,” Jordan said, according to CNN.

Last week, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) temporarily assigned Jordan to the House Intelligence Committee as the impeachment inquiry was about to enter its public phase. A few days earlier, Jordan dismissed EU ambassador Gordon Sondland’s revised testimony, which confirmed Trump’s quid pro quo, as “Sondland’s opinion” but argued that the testimony of Ukraine envoy Kurt Volker, in which he denied being aware of any quid pro quo, is a “definitive account.”

Latest News
53
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. This is a combination of The Godfather and Animal House.

  2. This whole defense of ‘the victim didn’t know, so there was no harm, no foul’ has got to be stopped. Because if this prevails then they will be no “attempted murder, rape, blackmail, ect” charges.

  3. Roofie rapist defense.

  4. What Trump is attempting is witness intimidation, of course the Nazis in the republican party and evangelical churches are fine with that.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

47 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for druid800 Avatar for deuce Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for hychka Avatar for sniffit Avatar for eglot Avatar for danny Avatar for lastroth Avatar for gr Avatar for ifeveroheverawiztherewas Avatar for bboerner Avatar for mtblaze Avatar for hoagie Avatar for demyankee Avatar for rickjones Avatar for john819 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for timorwig Avatar for yellowbeard Avatar for tunaloaf Avatar for dicktater Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for anon84323658

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: