House Takes Step Towards Impeachment With Mueller Doc Demand

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), (L), enters the hearing for the testimony of  Acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew Whitaker before the House Judiciary Committee on the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Friday, February 08, 2019. (Photo by Cheriss May/NurPhoto)
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), (L), enters the hearing for the testimony of Acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew Whitaker before the House Judiciary Committee on the special counsel invest... House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), (L), enters the hearing for the testimony of Acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew Whitaker before the House Judiciary Committee on the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Friday, February 08, 2019. (Photo by Cheriss May/NurPhoto via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Democrats are investigating whether to impeach President Trump, according to a Friday petition for a D.C. federal judge to release grand jury information from the investigation of former special counsel Robert Mueller.

“This Committee is conducting an investigation to determine whether to recommend articles of impeachment,” the filing reads.

House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler (D-NY) sent the petition for a tailored array of information from the Mueller investigation to D.C. chief judge Beryl Howell, who will decide whether to release the protected material to Congress.

Congressional investigators limited the request to four categories of information relevant to a potential impeachment inquiry emanating from the Mueller investigation: the extent of President Donald Trump’s knowledge of Russian interference during the 2016 election; his knowledge of any links between his campaign and Russia; his knowledge of any “potential criminal acts” by him or his associates; and actions taken by former White House counsel Don McGahn.

Nadler announced that he would file the application at a midday Friday press conference on Capitol Hill, telling reporters that his committee had a “responsibility”to open the inquiry.

In the filing, House Democrats said that in order to ensure that President Trump is held accountable in the wake of the Mueller report, the House must have the necessary information to “consider whether to exercise its full Article I powers, including a constitutional power of the utmost gravity—approval of articles of impeachment.”

Federal law tightly restricts when documents or testimony collected during a grand jury investigation can be released.

The Friday filing asks Judge Howell to release the material to Congress under an exception allowing for “judicial proceedings” — arguing that the potential future impeachment of President Trump in the Senate is a form of judicial action.

In the filing, House attorneys relied on arguments dating to Watergate, when Judge John Sirica agreed to a request from the House Judiciary Committee to release the underlying grand jury material collected during the Watergate investigation.

The filing refers to the case of H. R. Haldeman, the Richard Nixon chief of staff who went to prison for charges relating to Watergate. After Judge Sirica ordered the material released, Haldeman moved to block the documents from changing hands under the same grand jury secrecy provision cited by Attorney General Bill Barr in declining to release the information to Congress.

“Here, as in Haldeman, a specially appointed prosecutor has produced extensive evidence of misconduct by a sitting President,” House Democrats write. “And here, as in Haldeman, the Department has adopted the view that a sitting President cannot be indicted—while the specially appointed prosecutor has acknowledged the importance of Congress’s own ‘constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.'”

Read the petition here:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. “This Committee is conducting an investigation to determine whether to recommend articles of impeachment,” the filing reads.

    Good news for a Friday afternoon!

  2. I’m really liking this. Perhaps they sensed my impatience and frustration.

  3. Slow and Steady wins. Going off half-cocked may feel good, but it loses most of the time.

    This is not a “swipe-left” situation, it is dead serious and you need dead serious EVIDENCE before pulling the trigger on Impeachment.

    May as well get all the Court Challenges out of the way now, BEFORE the Impeachment Inquiry so once we get around to it (you have over 14 months until the Democratic Convention) Impeachment can move along without endless court maneuvering by the White House.

  4. I’m just gonna go cue up the “Hallelujah” chorus now. This is the legal move we need, by gum!

  5. I guess we now know how Pelosi and Nadler’s conversation went.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

108 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for jcs Avatar for blandsten Avatar for cervantes Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for sniffit Avatar for kitty Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for jinnj Avatar for daulphin Avatar for georgeh Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for expatls1954 Avatar for brian512 Avatar for beherenow Avatar for kenga Avatar for outis Avatar for paul_lukasiak Avatar for rucleare Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: