House Demands Docs From DOJ On Trump-era Records Seizure Of Congress, Journos

UNITED STATES - DECEMBER 13: Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., prepares to address the media after the House Judiciary Committee passed two articles of impeachment against President Donald J. Trump on Friday, December 13, 2019. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
UNITED STATES - DECEMBER 13: Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., prepares to address the media after the House Judiciary Committee passed two articles of impeachment against President Donald J. Trump on Friday, December... UNITED STATES - DECEMBER 13: Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., prepares to address the media after the House Judiciary Committee passed two articles of impeachment against President Donald J. Trump on Friday, December 13, 2019. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The House Judiciary Committee demanded on Thursday that the Justice Department provide documents and explanations for how and why it seized the records of House lawmakers, journalists, and former White House Counsel Don McGahn.

According to a letter from Judiciary Committee Chair Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) to Attorney General Merrick Garland, the panel wants documents and communications from across the investigations, including information about whether the White House was involved in the investigations.

The New York Times reported last week that the Trump DOJ had sought records from Apple for two Democratic members of the House Intelligence Committee, Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Eric Swalwell (D-CA), as part of a leak investigation that also collected information on their staffers and family members.

Nadler said in the letter that his committee is focusing on unearthing evidence that Trump pushed the DOJ to conduct the investigations. Prosecutors also targeted multiple prominent journalists, and McGahn — all people who Trump regularly complained about on Twitter.

“We must determine if the Department sought these sensitive records for improper political purposes,” the letter reads. “Finally, because the news media, the Members of Congress identified in recent reports, and the former White House Counsel were so frequently targets of President Trump’s public ire, we must identify the full set of individuals who may have also been the targets of politically-motivated investigations.”

Nadler wants communications in which the Trump White House may have pressured the DOJ to conduct leak investigations or take steps to gather information.

Reporting that Trump-era federal prosecutors got subpoenas for lawmakers surprised many legal observers, in part because of how rare it is for the DOJ to investigate members of Congress in leak investigations.

“It really triggers this policy within the DOJ to give a greater level of scrutiny because of the respect the executive branch should have for the legislative branch,” Barb McQuade, a former U.S. Attorney, told TPM.

But it raised questions about whether the motivation for the investigations was problematic.

“Whenever you surveil lawmakers, that is of course incredibly controversial, and you have to be careful that you’re doing it for the right reasons,” Alan Rozenshtein, a former attorney advisor in the DOJ’s Office of Law and Policy in the National Security Division, told TPM this week.

“The track record of the Trump DOJ does not inspire confidence that they have such prudence, that they did these investigations for the right reasons,” he added. “But at the same time, I don’t think the right takeaway is that this was obviously an abuse of power and they never should have [issued the subpoenas], that no one should ever be investigating lawmakers, because sometimes lawmakers commit crimes.”

Nadler’s committee opened an investigation into the revelations last week. He gave Garland a July 1 deadline.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. "…we must identify the full set of individuals who may have also been the targets of politically-motivated investigations.”

    Get Apple, Microsoft, Google, Sprint, etc. in front of the committee, put them under oath, immunize them against violating any gag orders currently in place, and the list of victims that Trump politcially ratf*cked will prove utterly jaw-dropping.

    Half the chairs of House committees – and probably half the Judiciary committee, itself – will likely find their own names on that list.

    The scope of Diaper Don’s depravity will be breathtaking.

    And that’s not even including his political enemies outside government (“Paging Jeff Bezos”)…

  2. You can’t fix things unless you know the extent of what is wrong. Apple must explain their public relations BS, all the while working with corrupt breaches of 4th Amendment protections. The targets of these specific investigations were not enemies of the state.

  3. Just makes you wonder whether Fattest Nixon has the slightest glimmer of how much crap is piling up on his doorstep?

    Nah, just part of the neverending witch hunt.

  4. This is great news! We need to understand what the hell happened at our DOJ?

    More importantly, we need to FIX IT and establish rules and regs to strongly prevent the destruction of our government ever again!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

20 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for fgs Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for trnc Avatar for irasdad Avatar for DuckmanGR Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tpr Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for maximus Avatar for libthinker Avatar for mrbugs21 Avatar for bcgister Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for Kurtywerty Avatar for Fire_Joni_Ernst

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: