HHS: Hospitals Must Offer Abortion If Pregnant Person’s Life Is At Risk

Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services speaks during a press conference in response to Supreme Court decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health at the HHS headquarter in Washington, DC on June 28, 2022... Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services speaks during a press conference in response to Supreme Court decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health at the HHS headquarter in Washington, DC on June 28, 2022. (Photo by Nicholas Kamm / AFP) (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Biden administration told health care providers in a letter dated Monday that they “must” provide abortion services if the pregnant person’s life is at risk, saying federal law preempts state laws or mandates that have banned the procedure in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

In its letter to health care providers, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cited the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), which requires medical facilities to determine whether a pregnant person seeking treatment may be in labor or whether they are in an emergency medical condition where an abortion is “the stabilizing treatment necessary to resolve that condition.”

“If a physician believes that a pregnant patient presenting at an emergency department is experiencing an emergency medical condition as defined by EMTALA, and that abortion is the stabilizing treatment necessary to resolve that condition, the physician must provide that treatment,” HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra wrote. “When a state law prohibits abortion and does not include an exception for the life of the pregnant person — or draws the exception more narrowly than EMTALA’s emergency medical condition definition — that state law is preempted.”

Becerra noted that emergency medical conditions involving pregnant patients may include, but are not limited to, “ectopic pregnancy, complications of pregnancy loss, or emergent hypertensive disorders, such as preeclampsia with severe features.”

“It is critical that providers know that a physician or other qualified medical personnel’s professional and legal duty to provide stabilizing medical treatment to a patient who presents to the emergency department and is found to have an emergency medical condition preempts any directly conflicting state law or mandate that might otherwise prohibit such treatment,” Becerra wrote.

The letter by HHS comes a day after President Biden told reporters that he is weighing whether to consider declaring abortion access a public health emergency — a move that would appease some Democrats, but clashes with some in his administration who question its legality and effectiveness.

During a stop on a bike ride near his family’s Delaware beach house on Sunday, Biden told reporters that he lacks the authority to force states with strict restrictions or outright bans on abortion to permit the procedure. The President said Congress would need to codify the right to abortion access and that voters should elect lawmakers who support that right.

The President said his administration is trying to do a “lot of things to accommodate the rights of women” after the Supreme Court’s ruling that eliminated the right to abortion access, which includes weighing declaring a public health emergency to free up federal resources.

Biden said he has asked officials “to look at whether I have the authority to do that and what impact that would have.”

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Trump proved the President can do whatever he wants. No need to ask permission from anyone.

  2. My ex-wife was a home-birth midwife in a huge Amish - Old-order-Mennonite community. She and her partner did anywhere from 150-200 births each and every year.

    Whenever, in a birth-situation, a choice needed to be made between the life of the mother or of the baby, the mother is always chosen.

    There are myriad reasons for this, but while they frown upon abortion as a valid form of birth control, they will save the mother.

  3. A group of pro-abortion activists in Michigan have succeeded in collecting close to double the signatures necessary to get a question on the ballot this fall that, if approved by voters, would codify abortion rights into the state constitution.

    Lets hope they didn’t hire that fraud firm that screwed the Republican Gubernatorial candidates…

    https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/05/24/michigan-election-petition-signatures-shawn-wilmoth-first-choice/9904601002/

  4. caveat - a republican president can do whatever he wants. Our court of mullahs will let a Democratic president know what he/she can do.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

83 more replies

Participants

Avatar for cabchi Avatar for fgs Avatar for zandru Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for inversion Avatar for tacoma Avatar for grandpajoe Avatar for topchap Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for darrtown Avatar for maryq Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jinnj Avatar for tsp Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for brian512 Avatar for cologirl Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for socalista Avatar for eaharrison Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for carpe_diem Avatar for xcopy

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: