Grassley, Durbin Announce Wray Hearing Amid Questions On Capitol Attack

on June 18, 2018 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 18: Sens. Durbin and Grassley (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) sent a letter to FBI and Department of Justice leadership Tuesday, demanding answers to a long list of unanswered questions on the January 6 Capitol attack.

Many of the questions focus on any potential red flags that the agencies ignored in the days leading to the attack, and coordination with other law enforcement entities. Reports have surfaced since the attack which show an internal FBI report identifying a swell in calls for violence amid rightwing online communities. Another showed that dozens of people on the FBI’s terrorist watch list were in Washington D.C. during the insurrection.

Grassley and Durbin also asked about what actions the agencies are taking now, in regards to any charging guidance given to prosecutors as members of the pro-Trump mob are rounded up and arrested.

Durbin should be the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Grassley the ranking member, but neither has assumed his title as the Senate organizing resolution is still being ironed out. Both men signed the letter as just “senator” without their titles.

Durbin indicated to reporters Tuesday that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is the reason for the organizing resolution holdup even after he backed down from his filibuster threat a few weeks ago. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) released official committee assignments Tuesday evening, one of the last points of debate holding up the resolution. A resolution vote could happen as soon as tomorrow.

In the meantime, Grassley and Durbin are teaming up to request information of FBI Director Chris Wray and acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson (whose acting role is another wrinkle left by the delayed organizing resolution — Sen. Lindsay Graham, the outgoing Senate Judiciary chair, is refusing to cooperate with Durbin about the start date for Attorney General nominee Merrick Garland’s hearing).

Grassley and Durbin requested the information be provided by February 16, and announced a separate hearing with Wray on March 2.

Read the letter here:

Latest News
76
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. So is there a link between this and whatever Graham was mumbling about earlier regarding the FBI? And why is Graham holding up the Garland hearings:

    • trump has something on him?

    • DoJ has something on him?

    • Both?

  2. “Durbin should be the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Grassley the ranking member, but neither has assumed his title as the Senate organizing resolution is still being ironed out. Both men signed the letter as just “senator” without their titles.”

    I guarantee you that, unless Durbin has the gavel, Grassley will immediately shut down any hint of GOP (or GOP donor) complicity/coordination the FBI suggests.

    It’ll be a total sh-tshow if Grassley gets to call the shots.

  3. Based on what we’ve seen from Biden/Harris Congress-wrangling in the past 2 weeks, I don’t think that Grassley’s going to retain much power to do much of anything after Merrick Garland is confirmed. Biden/Harris are moving fast and punching hard.

  4. Today in the “better look busy” section of the Senate…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

70 more replies

Participants

Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for voreason Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for becca656 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for dont Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for pine Avatar for triletter Avatar for tena Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for edhedh Avatar for Anarchy_Bunker Avatar for stellermeller Avatar for socalista Avatar for enn Avatar for dominic Avatar for evave2 Avatar for greenman66 Avatar for atldrew Avatar for pkpturbo Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for ClutchCargo

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: