Former Jan. 6 Committee Members Express Hope America May Soon See High-Level Accountability For Insurrection

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 05: House Oversight and Accountability Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) speaks to reporters after attending an FBI briefing in the House Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) at... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 05: House Oversight and Accountability Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) speaks to reporters after attending an FBI briefing in the House Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) at the U.S. Capitol Building on June 05, 2023 in Washington, DC. The chairman and ranking member of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee attended the briefing to review documents pertaining to U.S. President Joe Biden's alleged acceptance of a bribe as vice president, from a foreign national. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Lawmakers who served on the Jan. 6 select committee responded Tuesday to Donald Trump’s claims that he received a target letter from special counsel Jack Smith, expressing optimism that there would be accountability “at the very top” for the events that led to Congress being stormed in an attempt to subvert democracy. 

“I heard from a lot of people across America who felt that the little guys would end up facing criminal justice and accountability, but the people at the top would not,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) told TPM and other reporters outside of the House chamber. “And, if this is where the evidence takes the prosecutors, then I’m glad that our justice system is working.”

Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), who was also on the select committee, said that seeing accountability around the former President’s actions will be a “relief.” 

“I guess some relief that there will be accountability at the very top,” Lofgren said when asked for her reaction to Trump’s announcement during a Tuesday MSNBC interview. “We’ve seen a lot of the rioters themselves prosecuted, correctly, been convicted, sentenced to prison. But to date, the people who organized it, who schemed that up, have not been held accountable and I think it is important that happen.”

Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA), another committee member, said he would not be surprised if Trump was a target in Smith’s investigation and emphasized the committee’s work in bringing the former president’s actions to light. 

“We said time and time again, our focus was to seek the truth. And to make sure there is accountability,” Aguilar said during the Tuesday press conference. 

“We expect that the target letter and the work that the grand jury continues to do will meet that threshold of seeking the facts and holding people accountable, no matter where they are and no matter who they are,” he added.

Much of the committee’s work was shared with the Department of Justice for its own investigations into the events surrounding January 6, including materials not shared publicly at the committee’s conclusion late last year. The committee also made referrals to the DOJ, urging it to bring criminal charges against a number of key players in the insurrection, including Trump. 

“The premise of the rule of law is that everyone is subject to it and no one is above it,” Raskin told reporters outside the House chamber Tuesday. “And so, I hope that when we get through this agonizing period in American history, we will be able to say that everyone was treated fairly under the rule of law and that no one escaped criminal accountability for offenses against the United States just because of an office they once held or a certain kind of privilege.”

The reaction to Trump’s claim that he was a target of Smith’s investigation was, predictably, wildly split on the Hill Tuesday. While Jan. 6 committee members continued their calls for accountability — not just for the rioters but for the former president who they say instigated the insurrection — MAGA House Republicans were kicking up an unsurprising but particularly aggressive storm on Capitol Hill.

“Why are they doing everything they can to prevent Trump from being on the ballot in 2024?” Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX) asked during an interview with CNN. “I’ll tell you why. Because Donald Trump will win in 2024. And the left is just scared shitless.”

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who famously had a shouted phone conversation with Trump mid-insurrection, also stuck to a line he has advanced in response to Trump’s other 2023 legal woes: That the Department of Justice probe is just a way for Democrats to go after “those who politically disagree with them.” 

“The American public is tired of this,” he said during a Tuesday press conference. “They wanna see equal justice and the idea that they utilize this to go after those who politically disagree with them is wrong.”

Meanwhile, the conspiracy theorizing congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) utilized her new favorite phrase, “little bitch,” to describe the special counsel.

“Jack Smith is a lousy attorney. His career is filled with mistrials, overturned cases, and judicial rebukes. He only targets Republicans because he’s a weak little bitch for the Democrats,” Greene tweeted in reaction to Trump receiving a target letter.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Definitely not a cult.

  2. Avatar for jpc jpc says:

    Breaking news:

    The “Trumpettes” in this country want to maintain the fiction that his political resurrection is inevitable in order to intimidate individuals and offices into doing what they want rather than what is in the best interest of the collective nation. Once Trump gets stopped, it’s over for them. And the “Republican Party”, which lost control of the wacky fringe groups decades ago, should follow.

    Keep moving forward. Enough of the attempts to intimidate by the Republican Party. Let them accept the rule of law, not the law of the bought out.

  3. Empty Greene really needs to work on expanding her vocabulary. I’m much more interested in what Mr. Smith will have to say in court.

  4. Agree, I am waiting for the indictment. It ought to be a good read.

  5. I certainly hope that there are additional charges against the other slates of fake electors.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

59 more replies

Participants

Avatar for zandru Avatar for blandsten Avatar for epicurus Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for danny Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for thebishop Avatar for topchap Avatar for mrf Avatar for commanderogg Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for benthere Avatar for 21zna9 Avatar for caltg Avatar for justruss Avatar for counterlife Avatar for bcgister Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for old_guru Avatar for El_Grupo Avatar for timbomov Avatar for Vickie48

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: