Prosecutors Signal Anew That They May Seek A Harsher Sentence For Flynn

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 24: Former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn leaves the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse on June 24, 2019 in Washington, DC. Flynn is expected to testify again on July 15. (Photo by Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 24: President Donald Trump’s former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn leaves the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse on June 24, 2019 in Washington, DC. Criminal sentencing for Flynn wi... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 24: President Donald Trump’s former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn leaves the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse on June 24, 2019 in Washington, DC. Criminal sentencing for Flynn will be on hold for at least another two months. (Photo by Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Justice Department hinted in a court filing Thursday evening that it may seek a harsher sentence for former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who pleaded guilty in 2017 to lying to the FBI about his Russian contacts.

When Flynn was originally supposed to be sentenced in December 2018, the government was not pushing for prison time.

However, that sentencing hearing was postponed and Flynn has since replaced his legal team with attorneys who have taken an outright hostile approach to the Justice Department.

Flynn’s sentencing has now been rescheduled for next month. On Thursday, the Justice Department asked the judge the push back the deadline for its sentencing memo ahead of the hearing.

“There are multiple individuals and entities who must review and approve the government’s submission, including any changes from the government’s prior sentencing memorandum and its specific sentencing recommendations.”

Its explanation for why it was seeking more time to prepare the sentencing memo was revealing.

“Unfortunately, due to the holidays, the government is not able obtain the necessary review and approval from all such individuals and entities by December 30, 2019,” the filing said.

U.S. District Judge Emmett Sullivan agreed to push back the deadlines for the government’s and Flynn’s sentencing memos, but kept the hearing on schedule for Jan. 28.

This is the second time the Department has signaled it may be less lenient on Flynn as the judge prepares to have another go at sentencing him.

At a hearing in September, a prosecutor told the judge that the Justice Department would seek to file an amended sentencing memo when the time for sentencing came around again.

When Flynn was heading into sentencing a year ago, the Justice Department did not oppose his request for no prison time and praised his “substantial” assistance.

But, Flynn’s suggestion in his December 2018 sentencing memo that he had been a victim of entrapment irked the judge. Sullivan, at last year’s pseudo-sentencing hearing, suggested he may send Flynn to prison anyway, prompting Flynn’s lawyers to seek a delay so he could continue cooperating with the government and earn the full benefit of that cooperation.

Rather than back away from the strategy of accusing the FBI of misconduct, however, Flynn doubled down on it when he replaced his legal team last July. His new lawyers lobbed all sorts of allegations at the FBI — many of them based on far-right conspiracy theories about the Trump-Russia probe — that they claimed could warrant a full dismissal of the prosecution against Flynn.

After waiting for the DOJ inspector general to release his review of the Trump-Russia probe, the judge rejected those allegations. Flynn’s audience in the effort may not of been Sullivan, but rather a pardon-curious President Trump.

The Justice Department will file its amended memo on Jan. 6 and Flynn will file his own on Jan. 21.

Read the Justice Department’s Thursday filing below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. I take heart in stories like this. It indicates to me that somewhere inside our corrupt justice system, there are people who take treason seriously.

    Maybe I’m old fashioned.

  2. Flynn’s suggestion in his December 2018 sentencing memo that he had been a victim of entrapment irked the judge.

    Irking the judge responsible for your future or lack thereof is probably a bad idea.

  3. Not to an a@@hole (ret) General. He used to his orders being followed, not questioned.

  4. This guy should have been locked up long ago.

    Who’s paying his $$$$ lawyers?

  5. I dunno. But somepeoplesay the exchange rate for rubles is a bull market.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

62 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for tigersharktoo Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for darrtown Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for tstmauro Avatar for isepick Avatar for docd Avatar for rickjones Avatar for noonm Avatar for dcd Avatar for carolson Avatar for eaharrison Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for filmknight Avatar for rogerhead Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: