5th Circuit Panel Temporarily Pauses Order Blocking Government From Flagging Social Media Misinformation

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 14: U.S. President Joe Biden (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A panel of 5th Circuit judges granted the Biden administration’s request for an administrative stay of a widely panned lower court decision that blocked wide swaths of the government from flagging misinformation to the companies that operate social media sites. 

The stay will last “until further orders of the court.” The panel also expedited oral arguments, and punted the decision on whether to grant a stay pending appeal to the merits panel that will hear them. 

The lower court judge, Donald Trump appointee Judge Terry Doughty, had ruled that government officials flagging potentially dangerous social media posts — largely about COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories — was a violation of the First Amendment. 

He denied the government’s stay requests — saying that the injury to those being “censored” was far greater than the government’s — and the Justice Department immediately took its case to the 5th circuit. 

Using unusually harsh language, the DOJ wrote that Doughty’s ruling “reflects numerous legal errors” and that its scope is an “abuse of discretion.” It also asked that, at the very least, the relief be constrained to the named parties in the suit so as to not affect the “vast universe of government actions lacking any connection to plaintiffs.”

Doughty, a consistently anti-Biden administration judge, had referred to the administration’s attempt to restrict COVID-19 misinformation as “Orwellian” and “dystopian” in his original ruling. He rehashed some of those examples of government “censorship” in his denial of the stay request. 

His ruling is the latest example of right-wing judges taking advantage of nationwide relief to set government policy.

Read the order here:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Using unusually harsh language, the DOJ wrote that Doughty’s ruling “reflects numerous legal errors” and that its scope is an “abuse of discretion.” It also asked that, at the very least, the relief be constrained to the named parties in the suit so as to not affect the “vast universe of government actions lacking any connection to plaintiffs.”

    Typical right wing nonsense, of course, but at some point, SCOTUS will get this case. I don’t think we can have any confidence that the Supremes will find for Biden.

    Now, if GQP takes the government again, all bets are off.

  2. A ruling too crazy for the 5th Circuit.

    THAT’S a crazy ass ruling.

  3. So no freedom of speech for government officials?

  4. I will take a wait and see attitude before I applaud the 5th Circuit for this temporary pause.

  5. I will take this as a good sign for now. You just know this will end up before the Purchased Court, so I’ll wait.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

24 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for runfastandwin Avatar for ealleniii Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for eda Avatar for epicurus Avatar for trnc Avatar for becca656 Avatar for arrendis Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for claimsadjuster Avatar for commanderogg Avatar for isakindamagic Avatar for noonm Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for karlwlewis Avatar for bcgister Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for VeganMilitia Avatar for old_guru Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: