DOJ Tries To Stymie Jan. 6 Defendants From Exploiting McCarthy-Carlson Surveillance Vid Gambit 

WASHINGTON D.C., USA - JANUARY 6: Police clash with supporters of US President Donald Trump who breached security and entered the Capitol building in Washington D.C., United States on January 06, 2021. Pro-Trump riot... WASHINGTON D.C., USA - JANUARY 6: Police clash with supporters of US President Donald Trump who breached security and entered the Capitol building in Washington D.C., United States on January 06, 2021. Pro-Trump rioters stormed the US Capitol as lawmakers were set to sign off Wednesday on President-elect Joe Biden's electoral victory in what was supposed to be a routine process headed to Inauguration Day. (Photo by Mostafa Bassim/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Justice Department argued on Tuesday that Jan. 6 defendants shouldn’t be allowed to delay their upcoming criminal trials based on speculation that the 40,000-plus hours of security footage House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) recently made available exclusively to Fox News’s Tucker Carlson might contain exculpatory evidence.

“The United States does not know the extent of any material that a member of the legislative branch purportedly provided to other individuals,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean McCauley wrote in a court filing for the Jan. 6 defendant Ryan Nichols’ case. “This Court should not commit to an indefinite trial extension for this Defendant, or for any defendants, based on the unsupported allegation that pertinent information may exist somewhere, but is not currently known to either the prosecution or the defense.”

The filing is one of the Justice Department’s first attempts to minimize the possibility of Jan. 6 defendants using the footage Tucker Carlson airs to drag out their criminal cases. 

The court filing came shortly after Nichols’ attorney asked the U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth to delay the late March trial in order to give Nichols’ defense team time to review the footage. The Justice Department submitted a similar filing in Jan. 6 defendant Shane Jenkins’ case in response to a request from Jenkins to delay the trial in order to review footage. 

DOJ lawyers pushed back, arguing that the defense team had access to a “voluminous discovery” — more than 4.91 million files — for nearly two years. 

“The Government’s discovery obligations in a criminal case are properly limited to materials that are potentially relevant to a defendant’s case in the government’s possession or control, and the government is not obliged to acquire materials possessed or controlled by others,” McCauley wrote, adding the trial shouldn’t be delayed “based on speculation about whether and when any such additional, likely irrelevant, information may become available.”

Prosecutors also backed up ongoing warnings from Democrats about the security risks of sharing the footage, arguing that widely releasing all security footage could “reveal the U.S. Capitol’s internal surveillance system to third parties” and “jeopardize the privacy and security of certain persons depicted on such CCV footage.”

McCarthy is using the surveillance footage to appease his right wing by facilitating an alternative, revisionist history of Jan. 6. The exclusive access McCarthy provided to Carlson has already led to a Fox News segment in which Carlson dismissed the deadly Capitol riot as a “mostly peaceful chaos” filled with “sightseers” touring the Capitol building. Similarly, House Republicans announced that they would provide accused Jan. 6 rioters with the security footage on a “case-by-case basis,” the implication being that exculpatory evidence was being withheld from defendants that many House Republicans have elevated to the status of “political prisoners.”

Read the court document here: 

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. When an attorney has no evidence to support his client, he thinks Plan B is to hope for a deus ex Tucker to miraculously save the day?

  2. If this wasn’t one of the aims of McCarthy in handing the videos over to Tucker Carlson, I would be astonished. Republicans are doing everything they can to muddy the waters around January 6, and to a certain extent it’s working, at least among Republicans.

    Since I believe the metal detectors are no longer in place in the House Chamber, if there was another January 6 type event, there’s no way any Democrats should turn their backs on their Republican colleagues. Greene has already said next time they’ll be armed.

  3. Looks as if these folks are grasping at straws, perhaps while praying they can delay until Trump is magically reelected as President.

    And then they would have to wait for Trump to actually care about someone else when he has nothing to gain from doing so.

  4. Avatar for trnc trnc says:

    McCarthy says he released the footage to Tucker in the interest of transparency. I would posit that nothing could be as transparent as the footage showing McCarthy shitting his pants while desperately trying to get DT to call off his mob.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

22 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for davex Avatar for zandru Avatar for navamske Avatar for trnc Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for losamigos Avatar for irasdad Avatar for danny Avatar for lastroth Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for brian512 Avatar for prometheus_bic Avatar for libthinker Avatar for xaxnar Avatar for euglena4056 Avatar for joanmariet Avatar for jwbuho Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for eaharrison Avatar for gargoyle Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: