Dems To Cite Trump’s G-7 Doral Mess As More Evidence In Their Emoluments Lawsuit

Christine Blasey Ford testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill September 27, 2018 in Washington, DC. A professor at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine, Ford has accused Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during a party in 1982 when they were high school students in suburban Maryland.
Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) listens to testimony from Christine Blasey Ford September 27, 2018. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Democrats suing President Donald Trump over alleged emoluments clause violations will bring up Trump’s now-reversed decision to hold next year’s G-7 summit at his resort in Doral, Florida to help bolster their case on Tuesday.

Led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Democrats will file a briefing in their lawsuit in the D.C. Circuit of Appeals that will mention Trump’s decision as an example of the President flouting what he calls the “phony” emoluments clause.

“The President may have decided, for now, not to go ahead with his plan to hold the G7 summit at his Doral resort, but the fact that he even thought about it, underscores once again that he has zero regard for the Foreign Emoluments Clause,” Blumenthal said in an emailed statement to TPM. “That’s why my lawsuit to hold the President accountable to the Constitution is so important.”

“My colleagues and I are about to file a brief in our case, and as we note there, the President’s attempt to award the G7 summit to his Doral resort shows how increasingly brazen he’s becoming,” he continued.

Before Trump cancelled his G-7 decision on Saturday, the White House had attempted to mitigate criticism decrying the obvious conflict of interest by telling reporters that Trump would only charge for the event “at cost.”

However, that failed to quell the backlash from critics on both sides of the aisle, forcing Trump to backtrack.

On Monday, the President complained that accusations of using the G-7 to promote his resort were bogus.

“Who cares?” Trump said. “You don’t think I get enough promotion? I get more promotion than any human being that’s ever lived.”

Notable Replies

  1. Trump took an oath, in no uncertain terms, to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, so help me God,” and now he is calling part of it phony?? Why could that be anything other than, in addition to his other High Crimes and Misdemeanors, impeachable??

  2. Avatar for sandi sandi says:

    Great! Hit him from as many directions as possible.

  3. “The President may have decided, for now, not to go ahead with his plan to hold the G7 summit at his Doral resort, but the fact that he even thought about it, underscores once again that he has zero regard for the Foreign Emoluments Clause.”

    The fact that he thought about it and even suggested it to his Chief of Staff.

  4. I am still snickering that Rome Burning in Man Form had to have carefully lined up his shoe before he shot himself in the foot.

    This has got to be the Doofus version of picking up a 7-10 split.

  5. Since he withdrew it (because of the insane Dems, of course), is it now no longer without merit?

    @benthere, a classic case of not knowing what he was signing up for. Had he understood even half of it, he never would have run.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

20 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for sandi Avatar for guineapig Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for cervantes Avatar for becca656 Avatar for DuckmanGR Avatar for thebigragu Avatar for drriddle Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for benthere Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for birdford Avatar for katex Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for Bri2k

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: