Coronavirus Death Toll In Wuhan Jumps 50% After Review

FILE - In this Feb. 1, 2020, file photo, funeral home workers remove the body of a person suspected to have died from the coronavirus outbreak from a residential building in Wuhan in central China's Hubei Province. T... FILE - In this Feb. 1, 2020, file photo, funeral home workers remove the body of a person suspected to have died from the coronavirus outbreak from a residential building in Wuhan in central China's Hubei Province. The central Chinese city of Wuhan has raised its number of COVID-19 fatalities by more than 1,000. State media said the undercount had been due to the insufficient admission capabilities at overwhelmed medical facilities at the peak of the outbreak. (Chinatopix via AP, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

BEIJING (AP) — China’s official death toll from the coronavirus pandemic jumped sharply Friday as the hardest-hit city of Wuhan announced a major revision that added nearly 1,300 fatalities.

The new figures resulted from an in-depth review of deaths during a response that was chaotic in the early days. They raised the official toll in Wuhan by 50% to 3,869 deaths. While China has yet to update its national totals, the revised numbers push up China’s total to 4,632 deaths from a previously reported 3,342.

The higher numbers are not a surprise — it is virtually impossible to get an accurate count when health systems are overwhelmed at the height of a crisis — and they confirm suspicions that many more people died than the official figures had showed.

The undercount stemmed from several factors, according to a notification issued by Wuhan’s coronavirus response headquarters and published by the official Xinhua News Agency.

The reasons included the deaths of people at home because overwhelmed hospitals had no room for them, mistaken reporting by medical staff focused on saving lives, and deaths at a few medical institutions that weren’t linked to the epidemic information network, it said.

“As a result, belated, missed and mistaken reporting occurred,” Xinhua quoted an unidentified official from the city’s response headquarters as saying.

Deaths outside hospitals were not registered previously and some medical institutions reported cases late or not at all, the official said.

A group to review the numbers was established in late March. It looked at data from multiple sources including the city’s hospital and funeral service systems and collected information from fever clinics, temporary hospitals, quarantine sites, prisons and elderly care centers.

The review found 1,454 additional deaths, as well as 164 that had been double-counted or misclassified as coronavirus cases, resulting in a net increase of 1,290. The number of confirmed cases in the city of 11 million people was revised up slightly to 50,333.

Questions have long swirled around the accuracy of China’s case reporting, with Wuhan in particular going several days in January without reporting new cases or deaths. That has led to accusations that Chinese officials were seeking to minimize the impact of the outbreak and could have brought it under control sooner.

A group of eight medical workers, including a doctor who later died from the virus, were even reprimanded and threatened by police after they tried to alert others about the disease over social media.

Chinese officials have denied covering up cases, saying their reports were accurate and timely.

“The data released by Wuhan reflects openness and transparency and an attitude of seeking truth from facts,” foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said Friday.

The U.N.’s World Health Organization has come under criticism for defending China’s handling of the outbreak and U.S. President Donald Trump has suspended funding to WHO over what he alleges is its pro-China bias.

Trump’s blaming of China came after he initially showered praise on Chinese President Xi Jinping for the country’s response, while largely dismissing the risk it posed to the U.S.

At the start of the outbreak, China proceeded cautiously and largely in secret, emphasizing political stability. Experts estimate more than 3,000 people were infected before China’s government told the public about the gravity of the situation, which officials had discussed privately six days earlier.

The risk of sustained human-to-human transmission was also downplayed, even while infected people entered hospitals across the country and the first case outside China was found, in Thailand.

As Trump and other U.S. officials and lawmakers started blaming China for the outbreak, Chinese officials pushed back. “It might be US army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan,” Zhao tweeted in March, picking up on an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Li was one of eight people authorities targeted for “sharing false information”

    Why does this sound familiar?

    Because we’ve seen this happen right here in our country, a republic that embodies democracy…
    Our wanna-be king is targeting anyone and everyone who can tell the truth, esp. those that tells the truth about his corruption, criminality and braveness!

  2. The same trend will undoubtedly emerge in the US, not that Donnie is in any way whatsoever responsible.

  3. What is the date on this doc’s twitter messages that got him in trouble?
    Had he contacted WHO ?

  4. A cautionary tale to be sure. This will be us as well. Look at what happened in New York City…the reported increase of deaths was not nefarious, but just better data with the passage of time.

    We will most likely have many instances like this and like China is now admitting to. :confused:

  5. Avatar for darcy darcy says:

    The same trend will undoubtedly emerge in the US, not that Donnie is in any way whatsoever responsible.

    It’s all on the governors now, just as lardass said yesterday. Of course he’s going to oversee their every decision and offer up a grade (in a toga, thumb up thumb down). How cool would that be.

    Chinese seem to have a bigger problem in that they have almost five times our population. Social disintegration is a real threat. Personally I don’t care. Haven’t found a good take out Chinese place in years in NC. Shredded pork is what they eat here. But I digress…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

12 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for mymy Avatar for joelopines Avatar for hagarwood Avatar for darcy Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for greylady Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for maximus Avatar for stevecoh1 Avatar for lanabill Avatar for totoska Avatar for quickq

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: