House Judiciary Schedules Wednesday Vote On Bill Barr Contempt Resolution

on January 29, 2019 in Washington, DC.
Attorney General William Barr arrives on Capitol Hill for a meeting on January 29, 2019. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The House Judiciary Committee has scheduled for Wednesday a committee vote on a report recommending that Attorney General Bill Barr be held in contempt for failing to turn over an unredacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report. If the recommendation passes, the next step — if Democrats seek to move forward with holding Barr in contempt — would be a vote on a contempt resolution on the House floor.

“Although the Committee has attempted to engage in accommodations with Attorney General Barr for several months, it can no longer afford to delay, and must resort to contempt proceedings,” the Judiciary Committee report released on Monday reads.

Democrats have issued a subpoena for the full report and the underlying evidence. Barr has not complied with the subpoena and has said that federal law prohibits him from removing some of the redactions in the public version, such as the redactions for grand jury materials. He has offered certain members of Congress an opportunity to view a version that has other redactions removed.

House Judiciary Committee Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said in a statement with the announcement of the vote that, “If the Department presents us with a good faith offer for access to the full report and the underlying evidence, I reserve the right to postpone these proceedings.”

The top Republican on the committee, Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) called the Democrats’ move “illogical and disingenuous,” and accused Democrats of launching “a proxy war smearing the attorney general when their anger actually lies with the president and the special counsel, who found neither conspiracy nor obstruction.”

The Mueller investigation did not find evidence establishing a Trump criminal conspiracy with Russia, but the special counsel did not come to a conclusion one way or another whether President Trump committed criminal obstruction.

The House Judiciary report, acknowledging the legal and policy issues Barr has claimed in defending the redactions, said the committee “has sought to negotiate an accommodation acceptable to both the Attorney General and the Committee.”

The redacted Mueller report “does not provide sufficient details for the Committee to perform its own constitutional duty and engage in a thorough independent investigation based on the Mueller Report’s findings,” according the House Judiciary resolution.

“It is imperative that the Committee have access to all of the facts contained in the full Mueller Report, to the evidentiary and investigatory materials cited in the Mueller Report, and to other materials produced and collected by the Special Counsel’s office,” the resolution said. “Access to these materials is essential to the Committee’s ability to effectively investigate possible misconduct, and consider appropriate legislative, oversight, or other constitutionally warranted responses.”

The resolution, later on, name-checks “impeachment” as one of those constitutionally warranted responses, “as well as the consideration of other steps such as censure or issuing criminal, civil or administrative referrals.”

“No determination has been made as to such further actions, and the Committee needs to review the unredacted report, the underlying evidence, and associated documents so that it can ascertain the facts and consider our next steps,” the resolution said.

Read the full resolution the Judiciary Committee will vote on here:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Contempt of Constitution?

  2. Avatar for leeks leeks says:

    I have plenty of of anger to go around. There is a very large portion of my anger set aside for lying, cocky obstructors of justice that head the Department of Justice. Nothing misplaced here. I still have enough left over to adequately engulf Little Donnie Short Fingers as well.

  3. Why vote not today? Barr defied the subpoena last week. More slow-walking.

  4. So, we’re having a meeting about taking a committee vote about taking a full House vote about maybe pressing our case with a contempt citation, or not, or a subpoena, or maybe seeking authorization to table and beg some more, and then maybe another preliminary vote, then coffee, subject to the phase of the moon and the final score of the Warriors-Rockets game.

    We got it, Jerry.

  5. Avatar for dont dont says:

    Off topic but on topic. When are we going to hear from SDNY? It seems Mueller shipped a great deal of tRump shit up to them.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

78 more replies

Participants

Avatar for sandi Avatar for rxbusa Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for silas1898 Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for dont Avatar for sniffit Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for topchap Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for georgeh Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for euglena4056 Avatar for 10c Avatar for dominic Avatar for phlogiston Avatar for kenga Avatar for chjim Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: