What Barr’s Letter Says About Coming Fight With Lawmakers Over Mueller’s Report

on January 29, 2019 in Washington, DC.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images North America

In a letter to Congress Sunday briefly summarizing his assessment of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report, Attorney General Bill Barr indicated that he wasn’t necessarily prepared to turn the whole report over to Congress.

This could frustrate lawmakers on Capitol Hill, who have indicated that they want to see not just the report itself, but the underlying evidence.

Barr specifically brought up the presence of grand jury materials in Mueller’s report, which was submitted to the attorney general on Friday. Under the law, such material can’t be made public. Barr said that he had asked Mueller to help him identify which materials in his report fit this category.

He added that information in the report could “impact other ongoing matters” that Mueller farmed out to U.S. Attorney’s Offices around the country.

However, he acknowledged, the “public interest in this matter” while vowing to release as much information as is allowed legally and under DOJ policy.

“For that reason, my goal and intent is to release as much of the Special Counsel’s report as I can consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies,” Barr wrote.

The attorney general gave no clear timeframe for when a redacted version of the report might be released.

“[T]he schedule for processing the report depends in part on how quickly the Department can identify the 6(e) material that by law cannot be made public,” Barr said.

It’s unlikely that lawmakers will be satisfied with Barr’s promises. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) already raised suspicions about Barr’s decision not to charge President Trump with an obstruction offense and said that he planned to call Barr in to testify.

Barr’s letter did not address other major questions surrounding what information the Justice Department will disclose from Mueller’s findings. One concern that’s been raised by those seeking full disclosure of the report is how the Justice Department will handle any claims by the White House that certain evidence is subject to executive privilege — a legal concept that allows the president to keep conversations with advisors confidential. Trump’s personal legal team has suggested they would use this tactic to keep Mueller’s findings under wraps.

Legal experts have argued that executive privilege does not cover conduct probative of a crime.

The letter also did not specifically discuss the Justice Department policy not to publicly release derogatory information about individuals it does not charge. Barr had brought up the policy in written answers as part of his confirmation process, but his letter only references broadly his commitment to complying with “applicable law, regulations, and Department policy.”

It’s unclear if that policy will become a flashpoint in Congress’ efforts to learn more about Mueller’s investigation.

Comments
Masthead Masthead
Editor & Publisher:
Managing Editor:
Senior News Editor:
Assistant Editor:
Editor at Large:
Investigations Desk:
Senior Political Correspondent:
Senior Editor:
Reporter:
Newswriters:
Front Page Editor:
Editor for Prime & Special Projects:
General Manager & General Counsel:
Executive Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Publishing Associate:
Front-End Developer:
Senior Designer: