Judge Will Review Comey Memos Himself Before Deciding If They Can Be Made Public

Former FBI Director James Comey speaks during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, Thursday, June 8, 2017, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Former FBI Director James Comey speaks during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, Thursday, June 8, 2017, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A federal judge in Washington on Thursday ordered the government to turn over for his review behind closed doors the so-called Comey memos, that various outlets are suing the Justice Department to release.

The DOJ has said releasing the memos would undermine the ongoing federal investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It had previously asked the judge, James E. Boasberg, to review an affidavit from an FBI employee explaining why releasing the memos is an issue for the probe.

Boasberg said on Thursday that he would review that declaration, as well as “all withheld documents,” in camera — meaning within his chambers – and without the other side in the case seeing them. He gave the DOJ until Jan. 18 to turn the documents over.

CNN, USA Today, and other journalists, as well as the conservative group Judicial Watch, sued the Justice Department for allegedly violating the Freedom of Information Act in withholding the memos. The memos were written by former FBI Director James Comey and are accounts of meetings with Trump where Comey claims the President pressured him to drop his investigation into former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn.

Trump fired Comey last May, and the existence of the memos became known first through press leaks and then through Comey’s dramatic testimony in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

The lawyers representing the outlets in the FOIA case cheered the judge’s move to review the memos, according to CNN.

“It’s rather heartening that Judge Boasberg has chosen to review the Comey memoranda himself, instead of just relying upon the descriptions in the agency affidavits. Given the significant public interest value inherent in these documents, the Government’s arguments against disclosure of them at all should be addressed with utmost caution,” Bradley Moss, who is representing USA Today in the case, told CNN.

Latest Muckraker
13
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Is it clear if the DOJ attorneys are from the Special Counsel, or is it just Main Justice who is stating the Trump protective position, while otherwise trying to sabotage the Congressional Investigations and obstruct the Special Counsel’s?

  2. Avatar for kblow kblow says:

    Great question! This really gets to the heart of the issue.

  3. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    The implication, I think, is that it’s DoJ, aka Sessions, aka trump, who is trying to keep the memos from being published. Mueller’s team wouldn’t directly have anything to do with this, I’d think.

  4. Thanks for the response. However, the Comey contemporaneous memos dictated or written after the meetings where Trump attempted to influence and shut down an ongoing investigation, are probably evidence in the Mueller probe. So I suppose there could be some value in keeping them out of public view until that investigation has fully explored all relevant and related aspects and statements made to their investigators. But I think your implication is probably right.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

7 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for someguy Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for ifeveroheverawiztherewas Avatar for zd123 Avatar for kblow Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for rriversong Avatar for karlwlewis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: