Barr: Evidence Mueller Found Not ‘Sufficient’ To Charge Trump With Obstruction

Attorney General Bill Barr said Sunday in a letter to Congress that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had determined that there is “not sufficient” evidence in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation to charge President Trump with obstruction of justice. Barr said the constitutional question of whether a sitting President can be indicted did not influence their decision not to bring charges against Trump.

Separately, Barr wrote in his letter that the special counsel had found no coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia in its attempts to influence the 2016 election.

According to the attorney general’s letter, Mueller opted not to make a “traditional prosecutorial judgment” on obstruction after his “thorough factual investigation.” Barr and Rosenstein then concluded that Trump’s conduct did not meet the legal definition.

Apparently quoting from Mueller’s report itself, Barr said that Mueller explained that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

In a brief discussion of why Barr and Rosenstein decided not to bring an obstruction charge, Barr noted that Mueller had found no coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia on Russia’s election meddling efforts.

The absence of such evidence was “not determinative,” Barr said, but “bears upon the President’s intent with respect to obstruction.”

“Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding,” Barr said. “In cataloguing the Presidents actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgement, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Muckraker
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: