Vitter Ad Says Dem Rival Wants To Release ‘Dangerous Thugs’ From Prison (VIDEO)

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A TV ad released Monday by Sen. David Vitter’s (R-LA) gubernatorial campaign claimed that his Democratic rival wants to free “dangerous thugs” from prison.

The ad attempted to tie state Rep. John Bel Edwards (D) to President Barack Obama’s criminal justice reform efforts. The ad’s narrator said that the President wanted to release 6,000 convicts from jail, citing The Washington Post, and claimed that Edwards recently pledged to release 5,500 Louisiana inmates.

“5,500 dangerous thugs, drug dealers back into our neighborhoods,” the ad’s narrator said.

However, a Washington Post report published on Oct. 6 actually said that the Justice Department was set to release 6,000 inmates “separate from an effort by President Obama to grant clemency to certain nonviolent drug offenders.” Obama’s effort led to the early release of 89 prisoners, according to the report.

The ad also appeared to reference remarks Edwards made in September at a historically black Louisiana college, according to The New Orleans Times-Picayune. Edwards told the newspaper that he never suggested releasing criminals from jail and called the ad a “smear.”

“I have never supported reducing our incarceration rate by releasing criminals from jail, as the smear ad suggests,” he said, as quoted by the Times-Picayune. “Rather, my statement about inmates in the speech referenced was about reducing the prison population through long-term solutions without harming public safety.”

One expert told the Times-Picayune that he thought the ad may have been racially motivated.

“It’s an ad to scare white people with black people,” Pearson Cross, a political science professor at the University of Louisiana-Lafayette, told the newspaper.

It was unclear how much money Vitter’s campaign spent on running the ad or how long it was expected to run.

Watch the ad below via Politico:

h/t Washington Post

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. “the ad may have been racially motivated.”

    Wow. The milquetoast “may”?

    First of all, call it like it is and stop pussyfooting for fuck’s sake. “Thug” is just about the lowest frequency dogwhistle in the Teatroll lexicon at this point, bordering on not even being a dogwhistle anymore.

    Second, the guy’s statement wasn’t even caveated in any way. He literally said it was an ad to scare white people with black people. No “may.” No conditional language or modifiers whatsoever. So why the fuck did you feel it necessary to add one?

  2. Avatar for terje terje says:

    Going full Willie Horton already?

    Vitter is clearly desperate.

    Hopefully it backfires – all the race baiting ads (and Obama baiting ads) might serve to drive up African-American turnout for Edwards. And even in Louisiana, it may offend some whites with the blatant racism.

  3. Lee Atwater starring in White Zombie.

  4. And you can see in this screen capture the scariest “THUG” of them all:

  5. “5,500 dangerous thugs, drug dealers back into our neighborhoods.”

    You guys had really, really awful neighborhoods.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

34 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for jw1 Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for meri Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for humpback Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for topcat Avatar for sniffit Avatar for terje Avatar for johnscotus Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for dickweed Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for pshah Avatar for jinnj Avatar for clauscph Avatar for oregon100 Avatar for bkmn

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: