Trump Debunks His Own Polling Conspiracy Theory Mid-Sentence

In trying to sell a St. Augustine, Florida, crowd on his assertion that mainstream polls were rigged to favor his opponent, Donald Trump inadvertently blew up his own argument.

“Wikileaks also shows how John Podesta rigged the polls by oversampling Democrats, a voter suppression technique,” Trump began at a rally on Monday, referring to Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager. “And that’s happening to me all the time. When the polls are even, when they leave them alone and do them properly, I’m leading. But you see these polls where they’re polling Democrats. How’s Trump doing? Oh, he’s down. They’re polling Democrats!”

Then Trump referenced a hacked 2008 email from Democratic activist Tom Matzzie that references “oversampling,” a word which Trump supporters immediately took to mean “rigging” polls by adding disproportionate numbers of certain demographic groups.

“In an email, Podesta says that he wants oversamples for our polling in order to maximize what we get out of our media polling,” Trump said, reading the email in question from a teleprompter.

As many have noted, “oversampling” is a polling term which means polling enough members of certain political parties, genders, demographic groups, and others in order to get a statistically significant result for each group. These larger numbers are then weighted to their actual proportion in the population when the overall poll numbers are calculated.

In the hacked email, Matzzie also mentions “our poll” and “media polling”—signals that the discussion of oversampling is not about polls from media companies like the New York Times or Rasmussen, but instead about an internal poll intended to test a campaign’s new advertising material.

It wouldn’t make sense for Clinton consultants and allies to skew internal campaign polls, the accuracy of which the campaign relies on in order to make strategic decisions. But Trump didn’t seem to notice that as he read the email aloud in Florida.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: