Welp: GOP Senate Nominee Bucks Chamber On Ex-Im Bank

N.C. House Speaker Thom Tillis talks with the media outside Precinct 75 at Holy Covenant UCC in Charlotte, N.C. on Tuesday, May 6, 2014. Tillis is running in the highest-profile race Tuesday, the Republican U.S. Sena... N.C. House Speaker Thom Tillis talks with the media outside Precinct 75 at Holy Covenant UCC in Charlotte, N.C. on Tuesday, May 6, 2014. Tillis is running in the highest-profile race Tuesday, the Republican U.S. Senate primary, which has drawn a field of nine candidates. (AP Photo/The Charlotte Observer, Jeff Siner) MAGS OUT; TV OUT; NEWSPAPER INTERNET ONLY MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

North Carolina House Speaker Thom Tillis, the Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in North Carolina, does not support the Export-Import Bank, which puts him at odds with the Chamber of Commerce.

Keep in mind that the Chamber of Commerce helped buoy Tillis’s candidacy in the divided Republican primary for Senate in North Carolina by pouring in $480,000 in spending to help Tillis in the weeks before the election, according to The Washington Post in April. But that hasn’t moved Tillis to support the bank.

“The Export-Import Bank is set up to play political favorites and give huge taxpayer handouts to big, billion-dollar corporations, a glaring example of what’s wrong with Washington,” Tillis spokesman Daniel Keylin said according to The New York Times on Monday.

Keylin added the North Carolina Republican nominee for U.S. Senate would only support the bank if changes were made aimed at helping small businesses.

The Export-Import bank, which offers loans to foreign buyers looking to purchase American goods, is a favorite target of some of the conservative outside groups that have helped create a divided and bloody landscape among establishment and tea-party backed Republicans this cycle. The Club for Growth, for instance, has aggressively attacked the bank and also lawmakers who support it.

The Times write-up notes that other lawmakers supported by the Chamber of Commerce also oppose reauthorization, such as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY). The Chamber said that doesn’t mean there’s any kind of disconnect.

“We are not a single-issue organization,” Chamber spokeswoman Blair Latoff Holmes said according to the Times. She said her group considers a number of issues when deciding which candidate to support. “Over all, if you look at the Democrats’ position on issues such as tax rates, regulations, energy and the E.P.A., unions, free speech and trial lawyers, you can see why the chamber supports the members that we do.”

(H/t: Dave Weigel)

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. The Chamber isn’t a single issue organization. It’s just a single party organization. The two Republican-manufactured default crises demonstrate conclusively that there’s no position too too-antibusiness to make it withdraw support from a Republican or offer even tepid support for a Democrat.

    Which means it is a singularly ineffective organization if it’s purpose is to affect policy and an utterly redundant one if its real purpose is solely to elect Republicans.

    And Thom Tillis? Yeah, still an ignorant right wing tool with the Kochs’ ALEC shaped hand operating his mouthparts.

  2. We’ll see if he experiences any consequences from biting the hand that feeds him. The Chamber probably expects it’s elected officials, once bought, to stay bought… just like in the private sector.

  3. These GOP tools think they can launder their plutocrat ass-kisser reputations with the fig-leaf of a “populist” stance against the Ex-Im Bank.
    No doubt, they will then feel emboldened and inoculated from charges of cronyism, and will then proceed by continuing to call for more tax cuts for the rich, more program cuts to the safety net, and rolling back of regulations for polluters.

    Just look at how the Chamber flack frames the issues she feels the Democrats are vulnerable on: tax rates (can never be too low), regulations (don’t need 'em), energy and the E.P.A. ((won’t somebody think of poor Exxon?), unions (god forbid!), free speech (unlimited, unregulated, undisclosed campaign contributions by Chamber members) and trial lawyers (immunity to polluters and big business).

  4. Just another cheap grifter fleecing the rubes (in this case the Chamber).

  5. “We are not a single-issue organization,” Chamber spokeswoman Blair Latoff Holmes said according to the Times. She said her group considers a number of issues when deciding which candidate to support.

    “Waving donor money in front of our faces really helps our focusing on the right issues”, Holmes’ thought bubble read.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

5 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for dopper0189 Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for bluejoubert

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: