Texas Bill Would Strip State Workers Of Salaries If They License Gay Marriages

Cecil Bell and Greg Abbott
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

State workers who issue same-sex marriage licenses would lose their salaries and benefits under a new bill proposed in the Texas legislature.

The bill, introduced last week by Rep. Cecil Bell (R), provides that state or local government employees “may not recognize, grant, or enforce a same-sex marriage license.”

If a government employee did issue such a license, they “may not continue to receive a salary, pension, or other employee benefit at the expense of the taxpayers of this State,” according to the bill.

Bell introduced the legislation with gay marriage possibly coming to Texas very soon. As the Washington Post noted, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is currently hearing a challenge to same-sex marriage bans in Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana and is expected to rule soon. Bell signed an amicus brief in the case supporting his state’s ban.

The bill seemed to anticipate an adverse ruling, taking a rhetorical shot at the federal judiciary.

“The State is not subject to suit in law or equity pursuant to the eleventh amendment of the United States Constitution for complying with the provisions of this section, regardless of a contrary federal court ruling,” it states.

The legislation also seeks to ward off any litigation.

“A court of this State shall dismiss a legal action challenging a provision of this section and shall award costs and attorney ’s fees to a person or entity named as a defendant in the legal action,” it says.

Lead image: Bell, left, with incoming Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. (Image via Facebook)

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for estamm estamm says:

    If a blue state were to have a law stripping employees of salaries if they DIDN’T license a gay marriage, then the right wing fauxrage would be dialed to 11.

  2. “The State is not subject to suit in law or equity pursuant to the eleventh amendment of the United States Constitution for complying with the provisions of this section, regardless of a contrary federal court ruling,”

    In other words, just another redneck confederate secessionist attempt at nullification…all because he hates himself some fags.

    I couldn’t even read the language of the bill without hearing a fucking twang.

  3. My law says you have to do what I want you to, and if you challenge it, I automatically win! HAH, SO THERE!!

    What an asshole…

  4. Newsflash: 11 is the only number on the dial and the knob doesn’t turn.

  5. All this hatred for the people not just like them will die kicking and screaming as it’s kicked into the dustbin of history.

    Eventually.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

71 more replies

Participants

Avatar for slbinva Avatar for ealleniii Avatar for Diogenes67 Avatar for lew Avatar for braxtonbraggart Avatar for msinformed Avatar for doctorbiobrain Avatar for crackerjack Avatar for mantan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for inmanroshi Avatar for javaman Avatar for progressiveoldman Avatar for EqualOpportunityCynic Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for captaincommonsense Avatar for suicide_arsonist Avatar for zuch Avatar for nelsonrobison Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jinnj Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for gajake Avatar for jalus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: