Peter Strzok Explains His Infamous ‘Insurance Policy’ Text

Deputy Assistant FBI Director Peter Strzok testifies before a joint committee hearing of the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill July 12, 2018 in Washington, DC. While involved in the probe into Hillary ClintonÕs use of a private email server in 2016, Strzok exchanged text messages with FBI attorney Lisa Page that were critical of Trump. After learning about the messages, Mueller removed Strzok from his investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election.
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 12: Deputy Assistant FBI Director Peter Strzok (C) waits to testify before a joint committee hearing of the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees in the Rayburn House O... WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 12: Deputy Assistant FBI Director Peter Strzok (C) waits to testify before a joint committee hearing of the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill July 12, 2018 in Washington, DC. While involved in the probe into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server in 2016, Strzok exchanged text messages with FBI attorney Lisa Page that were critical of Trump. After learning about the messages, Mueller removed Strzok from his investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Nine hours after the start of Thursday’s extremely contentious House committee hearing, FBI official Peter Strzok was given the opportunity to explain the infamous “insurance policy” text he sent to FBI lawyer Lisa Page — a text that has become a focal point in GOP conspiracy theories of a deep state plot to undermine President Trump with the Russian investigation.

According to Strzok, it was sent in the context of a debate over how aggressively the FBI needed to move on its Russia probe. He that said at the time he was arguing to aggressively investigate the Trump campaign even though doing so could put a source at risk.

“While it isn’t likely according to all the pollsters and everybody that candidate Trump is elected, we need to make sure we are protecting America,” Strzok said at the hearing, explaining what he was arguing at the time the text message was sent. “We need to responsibly and aggressively investigate these actions, because you know what, if candidate Trump is elected, there might be people we need to be investigating that might be nominated for important security positions. Everybody in America would want to know that. Candidate Trump would want to know that.”

In the August 2016 text, which was revealed as part of a Justice Department Inspector General investigation, Strzok referenced a meeting he and Page attended with then-FBI Deputy Director Andy McCabe.

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office—that there’s no way he gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40…” Strzok’s text said.

In Strzok’s retelling of the discussions that he was referencing in the text, some were advocating for the FBI to move slowly — and not put the sensitive source who had provided information at risk — since Trump was not expected to win the election.

“What I’m saying is look we’re the FBI. We need to do our job. We need to go investigate,” he recalled Thursday of his sentiments in that text.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Republicans: Context matters - not that you care.

  2. I just wish this article contained some basic information: who asked the question(s) that gave Strzok the chance to respond; reactions to this explanation; etc.

  3. The communications from FBI agents desperate to stop candidate Clinton will be up for a public hearing soon?

  4. The republicans are acting like one man’s opinion of Trump’s behavior after Trump attacked the Khans (in a private text) led to Trump losing the election.

    Oh, wait.

  5. The little I saw showed that they were only humiliating themselves. They did the same thing in the Benghazi hearings.

    Pathetic and comedic.

    “I’m a dentist, and I can read body language.” OMFG. That was hilarious.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

19 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for invitedguest Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for bboerner Avatar for dickweed Avatar for cgrantt57 Avatar for randybastard Avatar for formerchild Avatar for jruss Avatar for maximus Avatar for qwerty23 Avatar for captaintangent Avatar for jwbuho

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: