What Apology? Spicer Says No ‘Regret’ For Bogus Claim Of UK Spying On Trump

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Friday that the administration has no “regret” about sparking an international incident with the U.K. by surfacing bogus allegations that the British intelligence agency GCHQ eavesdropped on Donald Trump’s campaign.

Spicer’s unrepentant stance comes after reports in the British press that the White House made a formal apology to Britain after he publicly repeated Thursday a Fox News commentator’s claims that the agency was spying on Trump staffers on behalf of former President Barack Obama. GCHQ called the allegation “utterly ridiculous.”

Spicer did not seem particularly apologetic when asked about his claim before Trump’s Friday press conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

“Do you regret making the allegations? Repeating them?” the reporter asked.

“I don’t think we regret anything,” Spicer replied. “We literally listed a litany of media reports that are in the public domain.”

Under increasing pressure to provide any evidence for the President’s claims that Obama had his “wires tapped” during the election, the White House has turned to media reports that they say support the story. Yet they have also contended that sharing those stories does not mean they are affirming their accuracy.

In a statement circulated earlier Friday, the White House said that Spicer was “simply pointing to public reports, not endorsing any specific story.”

Trump similarly deflected responsibility during the presser with Merkel.

“I didn’t make an opinion on it. That was a statement made by a very talented lawyer on Fox,” the President said of Andrew Napolitano, a former New Jersey judge who now works as a legal analyst for the network. “And so you shouldn’t be talking to me. You should be talking to Fox. Okay?”

Fox’s Shepard Smith said on air shortly after the press conference that the network “knows of no evidence of any kind that the now-President of the United States was surveilled at any time, any way.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: