Schiff: Nunes Can’t Conduct Russia Probe While Acting As ‘Surrogate’ Of WH

FILE - In this Sept. 16, 2014 file photo, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. Jewish House Democrats personally offered Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a chance to lower the pol... FILE - In this Sept. 16, 2014 file photo, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. Jewish House Democrats personally offered Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a chance to lower the political temperature after he accepted a Republican invitation to speak to Congress next week on Iran _ a less provocative, closed-door session. Netanyahu turned them down, frustrating members of President Barack Obama's party caught between the White House and the Israeli leader. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes (R-CA) torpedoed the credibility of his investigation into Russia’s interference of the election by sharing related details with President Donald Trump, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) charged Wednesday.

In a steely press briefing, Schiff said that Nunes acted like a “surrogate of the White House” by going to Trump and the press with reports that the intelligence community “incidentally collected” information about President-elect Donald Trump and his transition team in the months after the election.

Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said it was a “deep, deep problem” that these reports were not first disclosed to him and the other committee members and that “there is no way we can conduct this investigation” if Nunes continued to relay information to the Trump administration.

Nunes’ unusual actions make “the most profound case for the formation of an independent commission” into Russia’s role in the election and ties between Trump staffers and Russian officials, Schiff said.

House Democratic members have previously made this case for an independent commission but been rebuffed. Schiff said he “certainly” intends to follow up with House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) on the matter.

Schiff also took issue with Nunes’ suggestion that any information collected about Trump and his team was obtained or disclosed inappropriately.

“Based on what the chairman told me, the names were masked apart from a single name which wasn’t necessarily anyone connected with the Trump Organization,” Schiff said. “The concern the chair raised with me was that the names that were masked he believed were associated with the President or his associates.”

Nunes himself said repeatedly that all the information he’s seen in these intelligence committee reports was collected lawfully.

“Did he unmask the president today?” one reporter asked of Nunes, who said Wednesday that Trump’s own communications were caught up in the reports.

“I don’t know,” Schiff replied.

Nunes, himself a member of the executive committee of Trump’s transition team, previously expressed serious concerns that classified information was leaking to the press.

In an interview with CNN immediately following his press conference, Schiff suggested that the new reports could be an effort by the White House, with Nunes’ collaboration, to “throw a cloud” over Trump’s unfounded charge that he was wiretapped by former President Barack Obama.

Trump said this afternoon that he felt “somewhat” vindicated by Nunes’ claims.

Repeating that intelligence agencies have found no evidence to support Trump’s allegation, Schiff said, “I don’t think anything is vindicated here except the President’s commitment to now quadruple down on a baseless accusation against his predecessor.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. I don’t think Nunes wants to be Trump’s surrogate.

    I think he wants a ride to the airport.

  2. This is so disturbing. Nunes has just torpedoed the House Intelligence Committee’s ability to investigate this issue, and at the same time apparently “warned” Trump about some of the information that the intelligence professionals are looking at. Clearly a violation of Nunes’ obligation to protect top secret information, and evidence that he is working for Trump not for the truth.

    While I know that Schiff is a partisan, I have found him to be an incredibly straight shooter, highly intelligent and relentless. I can only hope he pursues Nunes’ role and his violation of law

  3. Shades of Watergate…

    Will Ryan have the balls to remove Nunes or throw it to an independent group?

  4. Avatar for ghost ghost says:

    I fear public pressure will be the only way to get an independent commission. Nunes has zero credibility, but he’s not about to admit that he has a close-up view of Trump’s colon.

  5. Heh–that was a good one.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

161 more replies

Participants

Avatar for fess Avatar for ghost Avatar for overreach_this Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for ichthus Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for datora Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for nova Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for nymund Avatar for tena Avatar for edhedh Avatar for demyankee Avatar for tiowally Avatar for j.dave Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for socalista Avatar for drwho

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: