RNC Chair On SCOTUS Ruling: It’s Not Like ‘Million-Dollar Checks’ Will Go To GOP

FILE - In this Aug. 28, 2012, file photo, Chairman of the Republican National Convention Reince Priebus addresses the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla. After back-to-back presidential losses, Republicans ... FILE - In this Aug. 28, 2012, file photo, Chairman of the Republican National Convention Reince Priebus addresses the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla. After back-to-back presidential losses, Republicans in key states want to change the rules to make it easier for them to win. From Wisconsin to Pennsylvania, GOP officials who control legislatures in states that supported President Barack Obama are considering changing state laws that give the winner of a state’s popular vote all of its Electoral College votes, too. Instead, these officials want Electoral College votes to be divided proportionally, a move that could transform the way the country elects its president. Priebus endorsed the idea and other Republican leaders support it, too, suggesting that the effort may be gaining momentum. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus is marking Wednesday’s Supreme Court ruling cutting down the limits on how much money and how many political candidates donors can give money to as a victory.

“It’s not like people are going to be able to write out million-dollar checks to the Republican Party or to an individual candidate,” Priebus said Wednesday, a few hours after the ruling, in an interview with MSNBC. “All we’re saying is the idea that you have aggregate limits — in other words, you can’t give the full amount to ten candidates running for office around the country, or you can’t give the full amount to the Congressional committee, the Senate committee in the RNC, doesn’t make any sense.”

Priebus’s comments came shortly after the high court handed down the ruling. Priebus also cited the controversial 2010 Citizens United ruling, which allowed corporations, unions, and other groups to spend unlimited amounts of money in elections, in explaining his support for Wednesday’s ruling.

“Look, I don’t disagree with Citizens United,” Preibus continued. “I think it’s a good case. I think that we should all be free and exercise our First Amendment rights. But this is a victory today for people who want to see political parties and candidates on the same playing field or a little bit closer to the same playing field as the First Amendment was intended to allow us to be.”

Latest Livewire
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: