Pruitt: I Wasn’t Aware Of ‘Amount’ Nor Process Of Five-Figure Raises

Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) chief Scott Pruitt testifies before the House Energy and Commerce Committee after ethics scandals April 26, 2018 on Capitol Hill in washington,DC. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / A... Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) chief Scott Pruitt testifies before the House Energy and Commerce Committee after ethics scandals April 26, 2018 on Capitol Hill in washington,DC. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP) (Photo credit should read BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on Thursday again claimed ignorance, at the time, of five-figure raises given to several senior advisers of his at the EPA.

But his denial differed slightly since he last spoke about the raises.

“I was not aware of the amount, nor was I aware of the bypassing or the [Presidential Personnel Office] process not being respected,” he told Rep. Paul Tonko (D-NY), who asked about his aide Sarah Greenwalt’s reported claim in an internal email that Pruitt had approved of her five-figure raises, which utilized an administrative loophole to escape White House scrutiny.

The comment came during a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Environment.

Pruitt told Tonko that his chief of staff, Ryan Jackson — who signed his own name and “for Scott Pruitt” next to the approvals for Greenwalt’s and others’ raises — utilized “delegations giving him that authority.”

Still, in an interview earlier this month with Fox News, Pruitt said that he’s just “found out about” the raises “yesterday,” when they first made headlines. He didn’t specify that he was unaware specifically of the amount of the raises, and the process by which they were authorized.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. So, Mr. Administrator, are you a fool or a liar?

  2. Avatar for sanni sanni says:

    He already proved the latter on Fox. Now, taking this tactic, he proves it isn’t an either or item. It’s both.

  3. Could somebody please dial it back a bit ? one scandal at a time, please !, keep in line, no jumping the queue !

  4. What surprises me about the current situation is that Pruitt looks like a dopey, weak little fool. Whether or not that appearance reflects any sort of underlying facts doesn’t matter, because Trump doesn’t operate on facts. He operates based on how you look on TV.

    Trump is being represented by somebody who looks like a dopey, weak little fool. A sniveling idiot. A second Mr. Magoo, but a much more fireable one. Why hasn’t he announced a beautiful, amazing new EPA director on Twitter and thanked Pruitt bigly for his service to the country?

  5. Avatar for sanni sanni says:

    Because he still sees Pruitt as his safety net for if/when he fires Sessions.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

32 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for sysprog Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for irasdad Avatar for afisher Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for emjayay Avatar for sanni Avatar for ottnott Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for tribalogical Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for clauscph Avatar for edhedh Avatar for rickjones Avatar for erik_t Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for euglena4056 Avatar for drtv Avatar for evave2 Avatar for rascal_crone

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: