NYT To Conservatives: No, We Didn’t Crop George W. Bush Out Of Selma Photo

President Barack Obama, center, walks as he holds hands with Amelia Boynton Robinson, who was beaten during "Bloody Sunday," as they and the first family and others including Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga,, left of Obama, wa... President Barack Obama, center, walks as he holds hands with Amelia Boynton Robinson, who was beaten during "Bloody Sunday," as they and the first family and others including Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga,, left of Obama, walk across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Ala. for the 50th anniversary of “Bloody Sunday," a landmark event of the civil rights movement, Saturday, March 7, 2015. From front left are Marian Robinson, Sasha Obama. first lady Michelle Obama. Obama, Boynton and Adelaide Sanford, also in wheelchair. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The New York Times on Monday answered criticism from conservatives alleging that the paper cropped out President George W. Bush from a front-page photo of Saturday’s commemorative march in Selma, Alabama.

“Twitter was ablaze with criticism of The Times, many conservative news organizations wrote critical articles — and my email inbox overflowed,” public editor Margaret Sullivan wrote in a blog post on Monday morning.

“Some readers said they were canceling their Times subscriptions,” she added. “Others were simply disappointed.”

Among the scores of average Twitter users, Sean Spicer, communications director for the Republican National Committee, sniped at the paper on Sunday for leaving Bush out of the front-page splash.

The conservative site Newsmax also speculated on Monday whether the Times had purposefully cropped Bush, noting that a local station ran a wider shot of the march “and mentioned in its post that Bush was in attendance.” (The Times story also mentioned Bush’s attendance and noted that the former President signed the reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act in 2006.)

But according to Sullivan, the Times didn’t edit the photo at all.

“There was no crop,” ranking photo editor Michele McNally told her. “This was the photo as we received it.”

The photographer, Doug Mills, provided Sullivan with more detail.

“Bush was in the bright sunlight,” he explained. “I did not even send this frame because it’s very wide and super busy and Bush is super-overexposed because he was in the sun and Obama and the others are in the shade.”

Sullivan concluded that the explanation made sense to her, and that she detected no political bias in the photo decision.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. These whiners might be better served asking why George W. Bush preferred, or was asked, to march on the sidelines.

    Then they might want to ask why George W. Bush was ‘cropped’ out of the 2008 and 2012 Republican conventions.

  2. Yes, the NYT, which broke the story on the Hillary emails, is now beating the drum about funding to the Clinton Foundation, and, oh yeah, broke the Whitewater 'scandal" is clearly out to protect the Democrats. The right-wing seems to think that all media is like their own, propaganda arms for a favored political party.

  3. GWB was cropped out of the Viet Nam war, too. He’s like the anti-Zelig.

  4. Why did the New York Times crop WMDs out of Iraq?

  5. Another day, another reason for Republicans to whine about being victims.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

110 more replies


Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for slbinva Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for 365daysofhorror Avatar for brooklynmichael Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for manhattan123 Avatar for wiscojoe Avatar for ctvoter Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for sandyh Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for richardnixonhuberthumphrey Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for hora_del_cafe Avatar for Snafu Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for azjude Avatar for GreggH Avatar for glogrrl Avatar for rickjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: