NYT Public Editor: Paper Should Have Noted Change To Latest Christie Story

New York Times Public Editor Margaret Sullivan on Monday said that the paper’s editors should have noted changes in wording to its story on former Port Authority official David Wildstein’s claim that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie knew about the lane closures on the George Washington Bridge as they happened last year.

A Friday article initially said that Wildstein “had evidence to prove” that Christie knew about the closures but later changed the wording to “evidence exists,” and did not note the change in the article.

“This change was more than a nuance. Acknowledging that could have taken the form of a straightforward correction,” Sullivan wrote. “The change also could have been explained in an editor’s note or could even have been acknowledged in a sentence in the body of the article.”

Metro editor Wendell Jamieson defended the lack of a correction to Sullivan, arguing that editors made “dozens” of changes to the story as it evolved, and couldn’t possibly change every single one. He also said that none of the changes altered the “essential truth of the story.”

When Sullivan challenged Jamieson, however, he conceded that editors could have noted the wording tweak.

“I don’t believe there’s a correctible error in that initial lead,” he told Sullivan. “But should there have been an editor’s note? Perhaps. I regret not suggesting that.”

Christie allies criticized Wildstein for his claims and the Times for not acknowledging the change to the story.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: