Mulvaney: ‘According To The CBO, It’s Sunny And 75° This Morning’

Budget Director Mick Mulvaney, right, accompanied by Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price, left, speak outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, Monday, March 13, 2017, after Congress' nonparti... Budget Director Mick Mulvaney, right, accompanied by Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price, left, speak outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, Monday, March 13, 2017, after Congress' nonpartisan budget analysts reported that 14 million people would lose coverage next year under the House bill dismantling former President Barack Obama's health care law. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The director of the Office of Management and Budget responded to a pessimistic estimate from the Congressional Budget Office on Republicans’ health plan by dismissing the CBO itself as “terrible at counting coverage.”

“Good morning from Washington, where, according to the CBO, it’s sunny and 75° this morning,” Mick Mulvaney quipped to CNN’s Chris Cuomo Tuesday morning. (Winter storm Stella is walloping the Northeast.)

Mulvaney echoed criticisms that both he and Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price made to reporters outside the White House Monday afternoon. At the time, both acknowledged that they hadn’t had time to read the full report, but Price said its numbers were “not believable.”

So did Mulvaney on Tuesday.

“This is exacly what we thought the CBO would come forward with,” he said. “They’re terrible at counting coverage.”

“The CBO report says that 14 million people will lose care in year one. Let’s go very quickly to what happens in year one. The mandate goes away, that’s it. None of the new policies kick in. The mandate goes away. What does that mean? That means the CBO is telling you that someone, on the day after the Republican plan goes into effect, will drop off of Medicaid they are getting for free and replace it with nothing.”

“The CBO report is full of errors — not errors, they’re just bad assumptions like that,” Mulvaney said. “It’s the only way you can get to these bizarre numbers.”

The CBO estimated that, of the 14 million fewer people who would have care in 2018 under the Republican plan, relative to if Obamacare stayed as law, “[t]hat increase would consist of about 6 million fewer people with coverage obtained in the nongroup market, roughly 5 million fewer people with coverage under Medicaid, and about 2 million fewer people with employment-based coverage.”

Of those who shed their Medicaid coverage before the Republican bill scales back the program, in 2020, the CBO acknowledged some will give up the program simply because they are no longer bound by the mandate:

“Under current law, the penalties associated with the individual mandate apply to some Medicaid-eligible adults and children. (For example, the penalties apply to single individuals with income above about 90 percent of the federal poverty guidelines, also known as the federal poverty level, or FPL),” the report read. “CBO estimates that, without those penalties, fewer people would enroll in Medicaid, including some who are not subject to the penalties but might think they are.”

“Some people might be uncertain about what circumstances trigger the penalty and others might be uncertain about their annual income,” it continues. “The estimated lower enrollment would result in less spending for the program. Those effects on enrollment and spending would continue throughout the 2017-2026 period.”

Watch below via CNN:

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. What a dipstick.

    This is particularly insulting as the WH’s (secret) internal projection was 2M MORE people losing insurance than the CBO projected. In other words, the CBO was too conservative in their estimate.

  2. Well, if Muck Malarkey says everything is sunny and warm, you know a hellacious blizzard is coming.

  3. Sorry, Mulvaney, but the only one trying to blow sunshine up our asses is you. And almost everyone knows it.

Continue the discussion at

50 more replies


Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for silvrfox Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for sysprog Avatar for earlgreyparty Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for danf Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for becca656 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for diger Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for neal_anderthal Avatar for dickweed Avatar for pine Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for established_1781 Avatar for originalbob Avatar for corncaucus2008 Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for aiddon

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: