South Dakota Lawmakers Reject Rule Barring Sexual Contact With Interns

House Republican Leader David Lust, R-Rapid City, nominates Brian Gosh to become Speaker of the House before Gov. Dennis Daugaard delivers the State of the State address to begin the 2013 legislative session Tuesday,... House Republican Leader David Lust, R-Rapid City, nominates Brian Gosh to become Speaker of the House before Gov. Dennis Daugaard delivers the State of the State address to begin the 2013 legislative session Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013, in Pierre, S.D. (AP Photo/Rapid City Journal, Benjamin Brayfield) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A legislative panel in the South Dakota state Senate struck down a proposed rule change that would have explicitly banned state senators from engaging in sexual acts with interns, the Argus Leader reported Wednesday.

The primary sponsor for the rule, Sen. Stace Nelson (R), told the paper that the change was necessary because state lawmakers have previously engaged in sexual harassment and sexual contact with interns and high school pages. He said at least one lawmaker faces charges for allegedly groping a legislative page in 2007.

“The facts are, this body went through a very public and ugly trial about a decade ago. There’s been events in history that indicate these rules should have been put in stone and they haven’t,” Nelson told the Argus Leader. “This is a rule we brought forth to address this so that there is no gray area.”

Squabbles arose when Nelson told the panel that specific language needed to be put in place that would prevent lawmakers from engaging in sexual acts with interns, as opponents of the change said that there are already laws on the books barring such behavior.

“I’m hesitant to pass something when we get into itemizing every potential wrongdoing that a legislator could commit, lest this become a criminal code rather than a code of ethics,” Rep. David Lust (R), pictured above, told the Argus Leader.

The state legislature’s Rule 1A-4 states “sexual harassment prohibited. All members are responsible for ensuring that the workplace is free from sexual harassment. All members shall avoid any action or conduct which could be viewed as sexual harassment. A member shall report any sexual harassment complaint to the presiding officer of the house to which the member belongs. If the situation is not resolved, the member shall forward the complaint to the Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council.”

The state Senate’s Joint Legislative Procedure Committee voted 9-5 against the rule change.

Latest Livewire
83
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. What, not even a bit of watersports with them? Prude.

  2. “I’m hesitant to pass something when we get into itemizing every potential wrongdoing that a legislator could commit, lest this become a criminal code rather than a code of ethics,” Rep. David Lust ®, pictured above, told the Argus Leader.

    He just didn’t have in his heart to support the bill.

    As Jimmy Carter might say.

  3. “Sen. David Lust” okaaaayyy

  4. I fucking hate this country.

  5. Dave Lust: I cant support the ban as I just cant overcome Lust.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

77 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for ajm Avatar for serge Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for charliee Avatar for swirlystar Avatar for sysprog Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for breakingdeadmen Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for blugrass Avatar for quax Avatar for pshah Avatar for menocchio Avatar for jordanolsen26 Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for greysea Avatar for overthefall96 Avatar for skeptical Avatar for virginialady16

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: