Asked by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) if he believed there was widespread voter fraud, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh deferred and said he’d prefer to stick to what’s in the record of a case in front of him.
“There’s discussion of this issue and I would want, as a sitting judge, I would I want to see a record before me of what’s going on in a particular case,” Kavanaugh said. “I hesitate to opine on something based something I read in the law review article or a blog. I think you have a better sense of what is going on there. I would want a record in a particular case to determine what the evidence in the particular case was.”
In the exchange, Kavanaugh also said that he read UC-Irvine Law Professor Rick Hasen’s Election Law Blog — something that he alluded to Wednesday evening.
Kavanaugh: I have no thoughts, I have no feelings. I know nothing about current events or about history. I don’t remember the past, even my own, and I have no plans for and can’t predict the future. I won’t answer questions about hypotheticals, and I won’t answer questions about existing cases.
Now put me on the Supreme Court!
Question: If he refuses to answer any questions, why are we even holding hearings?
OT: Burt Reynolds just passed away at 82.
Thank you for sharing the laughs and your talent with us.
R.I.P.
Jesus on a Allosaurus, this is a no-brainer. It’s a statistical fact that voter fraud is a miniscule occurrence out of total votes cast.
THE COURTS AGREE!!
Boy’s either a wise guy or a bag of shit.
How does Kavanaugh’s avoidance of any substantive answers compare to other recent Supreme Court nominees?