Grassley Scolds Feinstein For Bringing Up ‘Unsubstantiated Allegations’

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) rebuked Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) when she finished her opening comments, scolding her for bringing up the other allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

“I’m sorry you brought up about the unsubstantiated allegations of other people because we’re here for the sole purpose of listening to Dr. Ford, and we’ll consider other issues other times,” Grassley said.

Latest Livewire
8
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. If only there were some federal agency that could, you know, substantiate things. Perhaps a bureau that would be tasked with investigations of this nature.

  2. Avatar for eloise eloise says:

    It is not going to help Grassley and how the Republicans look, if it appears, all day, that he is interrupting the women when they speak. Feinstein should jump in every time he speaks to make an irrelevant point!

  3. “I’m sorry you brought up about the unsubstantiated allegations of other
    people because we’re here for the sole purpose of listening to Dr.
    Ford, and we’ll consider other issues other times,” Grassley said.

    Right after we have our committee vote that’s scheduled for Friday.

  4. Avatar for jcs jcs says:

    The epitome of a white entitled revolting misogynist white male can’t handle taking responsiblity fir his reckless misogynist dictatorship,

  5. Durbin did well:

    “I’m sorry for what this has done to you and your family,” Durbin said. “No one, no one should face harassment, death threats, and disparaging commenting by cheap shot politicians simply for telling the truth. You and your family should know that for every scurrilous charge and every pathetic tweet there have been thousands of Americans, women and men who believe you, support you, and thank you for your courage.”

    The Democratic senator asked why the GOP majority refuse to press Trump for an FBI investigation, and he asked why they hadn’t subpoenaed Mark Judge — a Kavanaugh friend Ford had placed in the room as a witness and accomplice to the alleged assault.

    “The fact that you are prepared to name both Judge Kavanaugh and eyewitness Mark Judge stands in sharp contrast to the obstruction we’ve seen on the other side,” Durbin said. “The FBI should have investigated your charges as in the Anita Hill hearing, but they did not.”

    “Mark Judge should be subpoenaed from his Bethany Beach hideaway and required to testify under oath, but he has not,” he added. “Judge Kavanaugh, if he truly believes there’s no evidence, no witnesses that can prove your case, should be joining us in demanding a thorough FBI investigation, but he has not.”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

2 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jcs Avatar for eloise Avatar for bikerdad Avatar for manhattan123 Avatar for dicktater

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: