Grassley On Trump Selecting SCOTUS Nominee: ‘No Problem’

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, whose panel is responsible for vetting judicial appointments, arrives for a hearing shortly after President Barack Obama announced Judge Merrick Garland as his nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 16, 2016. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., repeated his steadfast opposition to holding confirmation hearing in the Judiciary Committee in President Obama’s last months in the White House and made it clear in a speech on the floor that the GOP-led Senate will not consider President Barack Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland, but will wait until after the next president is in place.  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said Monday that there’d be “no problem” with presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump nominating someone to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

“There’s no problem with Trump appointing people to the Supreme Court,” Grassley told the Associated Press.

Grassley noted Trump’s insistence that he would select conservative judges and his mention of William Pryor as a possible candidate, the AP reported. Pryor, a former Alabama attorney general whom former President George W. Bush appointed to a U.S. appeals court, has called Roe vs. Wade the “worst abomination” in constitutional law. He also once angered Republicans by supporting the ouster of Alabama’s chief justice for refusing to follow a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state’s judicial building.

Grassley is among those Senate Republicans who’ve said they want the next president, not President Obama, to select the Supreme Court nominee. But Trump’s apparent pathway to the GOP nomination after winning the Indiana primary last week has spurred some to urge a lame-duck vote on Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, if Trump looks poised to lose the general election.

Grassley previously was hesitant about the prospect of Trump selecting a judge for the job, calling it a “gamble.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: