Grassley: Dems Protesting SCOTUS Nom Blockade To Score ‘Political Points’

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In his opening statement for a meeting of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Committee Chair accused Democrats of trying “to score as many political points as possible” by demanding President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee be considered by the Senate.

He pointed yet again to a speech made by then-Judiciary Committee Chair Joe Biden in 1992 discouraging nominees be considered months before election. Democrats, including Biden, insist the speech is being taken out of context by Republicans and note that the Senate has not refused to take up any previous nominee.

“We’re already witnessing how raw politics is infecting the process. Regardless of what some are willing to admit publicly, everybody knows any nominee submitted in the middle of this presidential campaign isn’t getting confirmed. Everybody. The White House knows it. Senate Democrats know it. Republicans know it. Even the press knows it,” Grassley said in the statement, according a version released at the start of the meeting.

The statement came at a meeting of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is the committee that typically host hearings for Supreme Court meetings. Thursday’s meeting offered Democrats and Republicans on the committee the first major public face-off on the GOP’s threat to not even with President Obama’s yet-to-be-name nominee. Republicans insist that it should be the next president who choses the justice to succeed the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who died unexpectedly last month.

Their meeting comes as the White House prepares to announce who the President has chosen as his successor. Obama reportedly met with a handful of potential nominees earlier this week.

In Thursday’s opening statement, Grassley also railed against the idea that White House would nominate an Iowan judge that Grassley previously praised to put pressure on him to hold nomination hearings, which Republicans have vowed not to hold.

“We’re not going to drop any nominee into that election-year ‘cauldron’,” Grassley said, referring to a term used in Biden’s speech. “And I’m certainly not going to let it happen to an Iowan.”

He also slammed Democrats for how they handled the nomination of Robert Bork, who was nominated by President Ronald Reagan but not confirmed by the then-Democratic Senate. He also shot back at criticisms of a Republican-only, closed-door meeting last month where the Republicans on the committee agreed to not hold hearings.

“We knew the Minority Leader and others were going to make this as political as possible. That’s unfortunate, but ultimately it doesn’t matter, because it’s the right thing to do,” he said.

Read the full statement below:

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. And at every ten thousand points… I smoke two joints

  2. TODAY’S REPUBLICANS ARE AMERICA’S ENEMY WITHIN

    Republicans ARE practicing seditious DEMAGOGUERY and anti-democracy OBSTRUCTIONISM intended to destabilize our economy for purposes of political/financial exploitation.

    Republicans AREN’T making a sincere effort to STOP the bleeding THEIR incompetent leadership and failed policies created. Instead, they’re using inflammatory lies and accusations as a smokescreen to conceal their subversive agenda, which is to cause President Obama and America to fail so they can blame Democrats for the consequences of THEIR calamitous mismanagement.

    Republicans ARE preposterously professing that THEIR disgraceful political WHORING had nothing to do with the banking, real estate, stock market and employment catastrophes that resulted.

    Republicans ARE trying to hamstring Democrats to prevent them from repairing the damage caused during a Republican presidency that was irresponsibly enabled by Republican Senators and Representatives.

    Republicans ARE offering ridiculous arguments meant solely to disrupt and prevent progressive change. They’d rather divide America and create political gridlock than endure the political consequences of effective Democratic governance.

    Republicans AREN’T the LOYAL OPPOSITION; they ARE the ENEMY WITHIN whose mercenary priorities have eroded their moral and ethical standards to the point that duplicity and betrayal have become their preferred modus operandi.

    It’s one thing to advocate their conservative beliefs; it’s another thing entirely to willfully sabotage America’s government because a successful Democratic presidency would not be vulnerable to the greed, fears and hatreds that have produced and sustained the radical Republican anti-government corporatism and anti-Christian faux theocracies that are poisoning and crippling American society.

    Note: First posted late 2008.

  3. Blaming those how opposed what YOU started in the first place? geezus this is what “governing” has become? really

  4. In his opening statement for a meeting of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Committee Chair [Charles Grassley] accused Democrats of trying "to score as many political points as possible" by demanding President Obama's Supreme Court nominee be considered by the Senate.

    The choots-puh of this guy is unbelievable.

  5. Avatar for dswx dswx says:

    Yes, but it is all political equivalency don’t you see? The media tells me so. The Chuck Todds of the media world: “No violation of the Constitution at all. Especially if you are a GOPer.”

    :wink:

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

83 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for paulw Avatar for victorabrahamsen Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for swirlystar Avatar for sysprog Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for jdkahler Avatar for navamske Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for inversion Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for theyallstink16 Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for azjude Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for firewing2 Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for clintsn Avatar for canary02 Avatar for mpscott

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: