Federal Judge Rules: Trump Cannot Block Twitter Critics

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 16: President Donald J. Trump listens to President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev during a meeting in the Oval Office at the White House on Wednesday, May 16, 2018 in Washington... WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 16: President Donald J. Trump listens to President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev during a meeting in the Oval Office at the White House on Wednesday, May 16, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald ruled Wednesday that the President may not block his critics on Twitter, dozens of whom have been barred from speaking in the virtual debate halls that unfold below his Twitter missives.

“This case requires us to consider whether a public official may, consistent with the First Amendment, ‘block’ a person from his Twitter account in response to the political views that person has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public official is the President of the United States,” Buchwald’s decision began.

“The answer to both questions is no.”

The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed suit last year on behalf of several Twitter users who’d been blocked by the President.

TPM profiled one blocked account, belonging to the veterans’ group VoteVets, in June of last year.

“He is a thin-skinned charlatan,” said Will Fischer, an Iraq War veteran and director of government relations for the group, the day @VoteVets was blocked by @realDonaldTrump. “Donald Trump seeks to quell dissent and to surround himself only with sycophants who are going to shower him in praise and adoration.”

VoteVets wasn’t a plaintiff in the Knight Institute’s suit, but they celebrated the decision… on Twitter. 

“The First Amendment prohibits government officials from suppressing speech on the basis of viewpoint,” Katie Fallow, senior staff attorney at the Knight Institute, said in a statement responding to the ruling. “The court’s application of that principle here should guide all of the public officials who are communicating with their constituents through social media.”

Read Buchwald’s decision below: 

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. “Donald Trump seeks to quell dissent and to surround himself only with sycophants who are going to shower him in praise and adoration.”

    … and others who are merely silent.

  2. Poor baby…ya think he’ll follow the ruling?

    [rhetorical question]

  3. No critic could make Trump look worse than he already does.

  4. I was going to say “Tee-Hee!”, but this actually deserves a “Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!”

  5. He’ll ignore it. May even try to take his “right” of censorship to the Supreme Court.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

95 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for sandi Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for inversion Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for hoagie Avatar for benthere Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for zach Avatar for caltg Avatar for greysea Avatar for katscherger Avatar for erik_t Avatar for c_stedman Avatar for captain_america Avatar for desertdweller

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: