Senate GOP Officially Rebukes Warren Over Speech Slamming Sessions

Senate Banking Committee member Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D- Mass. listens to testimony on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday Nov. 12, 2013, from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard Cordray during the... Senate Banking Committee member Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D- Mass. listens to testimony on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday Nov. 12, 2013, from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard Cordray during the committee's hearing of “The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Semi-Annual Report to Congress.” (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In an incident that exposed the Senate’s divide over race, Senate Republicans on Tuesday night voted to silence Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) as she spoke out against attorney general nominee Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) and noted his record on civil rights.

The rebuke of Warren sparked outcry from Democrats, who charged that McConnell was selectively enforcing the rule to protect Sessions and that silencing Warren was demeaning.

Warren was reading aloud a letter written by Coretta Scott King, the widow of Martin Luther King Jr., about Sessions. She wrote the letter in 1986 when he was being considered for a federal judgeship. King accused Sessions of promoting racist policies, and witnesses at his hearing accused him of making racist remarks, leading the Senate to deny him confirmation at the time.

In the letter, King wrote that Sessions “has used the awesome power of his office to chill the free exercise of the vote by black citizens in the district he now seeks to serve as a federal judge.” Warren read that line on the Senate floor.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell objected to Warren’s speech, citing an obscure rule barring senators from “directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another senator or to other senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a senator,” per NBC News.

“The Senator has impugned the motives and conduct of our colleague from Alabama as warned by the chair,” McConnell said Tuesday night, after interrupting Warren’s speech.

McConnell interrupts Warren’s speech about Sessions.

McConnell would not let Warren continue after she protested his invocation of the rule, and Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT), who was presiding over the Senate said, “The senator will take her seat.” The Senate voted along party lines, 49-43, to keep Warren from speaking again during the debate on Sessions’ nomination, shutting down her attempt to expose Sessions’ views on civil rights.

McConnell defended his decision after the incident.

“Sen. Warren was giving a lengthy speech. She had appeared to violate the rule. She was warned. She was given an explanation,” he said, according to the Washington Post. “Nevertheless, she persisted.”

The vote to silence Warren came after Daines issued a warning to Warren for quoting a statement from the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA) calling Sessions a “disgrace” in the 1980s.

Daines warns Warren not to insult another senator.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) objected to Republicans’ ruling, and his spokesman, Matt House, said in a statement that McConnell “selectively” enforced a rule that Republican senators have “regularly flaunted” in the past.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) spoke out on Twitter and denounced McConnell’s effort to silence her colleague.

The Twitter hashtag #LetLizSpeak was soon trending as liberals slammed McConnell’s decision.

After she was told to sit down, Warren finished reading King’s letter aloud on Facebook Live. As of Wednesday morning, Warren’s video had amassed more than five million views.

Warren also briefly joined MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and said she was “red-carded.”

“I’m out of the game of the Senate floor. I don’t get to speak at all,” Warren said.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Pretty sure Republicans have been regularly flouting said rule; they “flaunt” their lack of principles doing so.

    –Headlines already seem to be coming down against the GOP for this action.

  2. Is there any continuing effect on Senator, being “rebuked”? How does it compare in significance to being “censured”?

  3. Oh, classy, guys.

    And, um, you think that’ll get Liz down??

    I suspect this will have the opposite effect from that which you think you are getting.

    What you don’t know about women is a lot….”

  4. F’ing Mitchy hasn’t been getting his naps lately …

    After this happened… Warren raised over 100,000 ----

  5. Avatar for anniew anniew says:

    I think they realized how bad this looked, it’s why they let Sen. Merkley read it later.

    Now it looks pretty darn sexist, too.

Continue the discussion at

145 more replies


Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for dbhuff Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for sysprog Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for eduardoinohio Avatar for datora Avatar for orthostice Avatar for mantan Avatar for yskov Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for jcblues Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for vlharpley Avatar for darrtown Avatar for menocchio Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for fraufeix Avatar for circusmax Avatar for aiddon Avatar for the_loan_arranger

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: