The Economist Review Laments Book Portrays All Black Slaves As ‘Victims’

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

An authorless review in The Economist takes issue with a new book on slavery in America, which argues that the U.S. rose to economic dominance because of its dependence on slave labor and the slave trade.

The review paints Ed Baptist’s new book, “The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism,” as a one-sided account of American slavery.

According to Amazon’s summary of the book, Baptist details how “the expansion of slavery in the first eight decades after American independence drove the evolution and modernization of the United States.”

But according to The Economist, Baptist’s account does a major disservice to American history.

The review dismisses Baptists argument that dependence on the slave trade was the main reason the U.S. economy grew so quickly.

“So Mr Baptist, an historian at Cornell University, is not being especially contentious when he says that America owed much of its early growth to the foreign exchange, cheaper raw materials and expanding markets provided by a slave-produced commodity,” the review reads. “But he overstates his case when he dismisses ‘the traditional explanations’ for America’s success: its individualistic culture, Puritanism, the lure of open land and high wages, Yankee ingenuity and government policies.”

The Economist then questions whether Baptist’s anecdotes of a few slaves’ recalling horrific conditions could really “adequately speak for all.”

“Another unexamined factor may also have contributed to rises in productivity. Slaves were valuable property, and much harder and, thanks to the decline in supply from Africa, costlier to replace than, say, the Irish peasants that the iron-masters imported into south Wales in the 19th century,” the review reads. “Slave owners surely had a vested interest in keeping their ‘hands’ ever fitter and stronger to pick more cotton. Some of the rise in productivity could have come from better treatment.”

The review concludes that Baptists book is in no way objective.

“Mr Baptist has not written an objective history of slavery,” the review reads. “Almost all the blacks in his book are victims, almost all the whites villains. This is not history; it is advocacy.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for anniew anniew says:

    What year is this? A slave that wasn’t physically or sexually abused was still owned and was only lucky to not be AS victimized as others that were owned by worse.

  2. Yeah! Where are the stories of all the blacks who became rich and successful while being slaves? Why doesn’t the author of Black Cotton mention them?

  3. The reviewer needs to tour some plantations in Louisiana. There are tons of them. Even the rosiest picture painted by the most sympathetic docent will disabuse him of the notion that the owners had much concern for the well-being of slaves.

  4. Puritanism as force for economic growth? How many Puritans does he think were here? They were not much of a population and their Purity didn’t last very long. Their prosperity is certainly not on par with other more acquisitive types.

  5. The comments on the review so far are pretty entertaining and universally negative. I smell an editor’s note or some other form of wea culpa coming soon.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

69 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for frustum Avatar for slbinva Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for anniew Avatar for pyanfar Avatar for chammy Avatar for trippin Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for RhondaPainter Avatar for Bassweasel Avatar for redacted Avatar for heartlandliberal Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for martinstett Avatar for jafafahots Avatar for jrfunkenstein Avatar for brendanm Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for hallam Avatar for smokinthegotp Avatar for seehowtheyrun Avatar for eggzacktly Avatar for onomasticator

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: