Department of Ed: UVA Mishandled Sexual Violence Complaints

The Department of Education found that the University of Virginia mishandled complaints of sexual violence, according to a news release from the Department on Monday.

UVA was at the center of an alleged gang rape described as taking place on its Charlottesville campus in an article that appeared in The Rolling Stone.

But, details of the report — including the description of how and where the rape happened — were soon questioned, as were the reporter’s fact-checking techniques, and the magazine publicly stated its mistrust of the woman who shared the gang rape story.

The article was retracted, an administrator from the university voiced her complaints to the magazine and filed a $7.5 million defamation lawsuit, and the managing editor resigned from the publication.

Even before the scandal, however, UVA was one of more than 100 institutions that were under investigation by the DOE to determine whether the campuses were in compliance with federal law.

The investigations were part of the Obama administration’s mission to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. A national awareness campaign, called “It’s On Us,” was also launched to bring awareness to the issue.

The DOE’s investigation found that the university had a “mixed record” of responding to reports of sexual assault and violence during the years it examined which were from academic years 2009-09 through 2011-12, according to the release.

The DOE found that the university did not act properly under Title IX and failed “to promptly and equitably respond to certain complaints of sexual violence, including in instances in which the university did not promptly investigate information in cases that involved fraternities.”

The DOE also cited a “hostile environment for the affected students” at the university, according to the release.

The Department of Education and the university also released a joint agreement Monday, in light of the investigation’s findings, to address and prevent sexual assault on UVA’s campus.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: