Gretchen Carlson To Testify Before Congress On Forced Arbitration Laws

Following her departure from Fox News and her sexual harassment lawsuit against former network boss Roger Ailes, Gretchen Carlson is set to link up with Democratic senators and testify before Congress about forced arbitration.

In a Time magazine profile published Friday, Carlson said that she has a passion for the subject of forced arbitration, that fine print in some employees’ contracts that disallows them from filing litigation and forces them to agree to settle all employment disputes with the company via arbitration.

“A lot of people that I’ve heard from [about being unfairly dismissed] find themselves in the middle of either legal action or, more likely, forced arbitration,” Carlson told Time. “It is a huge problem. Because it’s secret. And it plays into why we think that we’ve come so far in society and we probably really haven’t—because we don’t hear about it.”

While Carlson did not mention Fox News in relation to this cause, it’s clear she has her own situation—as well as those of other women she knows—in mind. The network initially tried to force the Carlson’s sexual harassment suit against Ailes into arbitration, but after the case caught fire in the media, the network settled with Carlson for $20 million. Fox also issued a rare apology, praising Carlson for her work and saying that she was not treated the way she should have been at the network.

Most recently, the network has attempted to force former host Andrea Tantaros’ sexual harassment case into arbitration as well.

Carlson has some unlikely allies in her new fight: Democratic Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Al Franken (D-MN), who are sponsors of the anti-forced arbitration law. Though they may have been the targets of some Fox News rage in the past, Carlson brushed off the unlikeliness of their partnership, telling Time that she and Franken are both Minnesota natives and that Franken beat her on an episode of “Jeopardy” in 2005.

She told Time that those in power need to think about how such laws affect women and about “what we need to do to change the system so that women feel safe.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

TPM Staff
Latest Livewire
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: