The day after he fired viral politics editor Benny Johnson over multiple instances of plagiarism, Buzzfeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith explained how his team reached the decision.
Smith told the Washington Post’s Erik Wemple on Saturday that Buzzfeed’s internal investigation included an exhaustive review of more than 500 of Johnson’s posts for the site.
Forty-one of Johnson’s posts were tainted with lifted text and a lack of proper attribution, a discovery that dismayed Smith.
“I was hoping what I’d find was a handful of instances from beginning and then somebody who had figured it out,” Smith told Wemple.
Johnson was fired late Friday, two days after a pair of pseudonymous Twitter users first exposed plagiarism in his work.
The Twitter pair, known as @blippoblappo and @crushingbort, followed up that effort on Friday by surfacing six more instances of plagiarism in Johnson’s archives, forcing Smith to confront the issue.
“There are serious instances of plagiarism in this post,” Smith told TPM in an email on Friday. “We’re reviewing Benny’s work.”
Smith announced the firing in an internal memo to Buzzfeed staff on Friday evening.
“Tonight’s decision is not a knee-jerk response to outside criticism, though we are genuinely grateful to the people who helped point out instances of plagiarism,” Smith said in the memo, which was provided to TPM by a Buzzfeed spokesperson. “Nor is it meant as a personal condemnation: Benny at his best is a creative force, and we wish him the best.”
Smith also posted a mea culpa to Buzzfeed readers shortly before midnight. The post has since been updated to include a list of the 41 posts with “plagiarism and attribution issues.”
Each of those posts now includes an editor’s note indicating that the copied text has been removed.
My mind wanders to all of the editors around the net and at TPM who are looking on with interest and what sort of thoughts? Are plagiarism charges lurking elsewhere, waiting for their moment to stun?
What Benny Johnson did is a misdemeanor compared to the felony level misinformation and blatant lies spewed on Fox News on a daily basis.
Sgt
On a comparison basis, yes, but highly unethical behavior for anyone – especially a presumed professional journalist.
People would kill for a job like his. Reckless behavior on his part.
On the other hand – as you point out – we have the Fox version of the Orwellian Ministry of Truth, a virtual party apparatus of the GOP that hourly and shamelessly spews outright lies.
Headline is a bit misleading, no?
From my understanding, Tweeters @blippoblappo and @crushingbort exposed Benny. Then Buzzfeed had to address the issue. It may have been at that time they reviewed the posts in question, however they were not the ones that discovered them in the first place. In fact, they’d still be in La-La Land, accepting Benny’s work without even crosschecking them had Benny not been called out for the thief he is.
It’s really helpful in controlling the PR crisis message, if your company is in the business of controlling messages on a daily basis.