Top GOPer: Senate Must Wait Until New Congress To Replace Holder

Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, April 1, 2014, following a Senate Policy Luncheon. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), the No. 4 Senate Republican, on Sunday said that the Senate must wait until the new Congress starts in January to vote on Eric Holder’s replacement as attorney general.

“I do oppose any vote on a successor during the lame-duck session. If it happens, it would be the first time since the Civil War that we’ve had a vote on an attorney general in a lame-duck when parties switched,” he said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Barrasso said that a vote on a new attorney general before January would just be a desperate and partisan move by the Democrats.

“But this shows the desperation and how the Democrats feel threatened that they’re going to lose control of the Senate,” he said of the timing of Holder’s resignation. “And if this happens, this will be Harry Reid’s final act in a tragic play that has been his legacy.”

The senator slammed Holder as a divisive attorney general and said that Americans need someone different.

“We need an attorney general for the people, not a presidential protector and a puppet of the administration,” he said.

“And if they try to do this in the lame-duck session, this will clearly poison the well and will define what we’re going to see for the next two years, the final two years of the presidency of Barack Obama,” Barrasso concluded.

Sen. Angus King (I-ME) countered Barrasso on “Fox News Sunday,” and said that Obama may actually nominate someone who garners bipartisan support.

“As far as the lame-duck session, the last time I looked, we’re still at work and being paid until next January,” he said. “We’re still the Congress of the United States. Let’s see what the president does.”

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Thursday said that Congress should wait to vote on a new attorney general.

On Friday, the White House dismissed calls to hold off until a new Congress.

“There is a precedent for presidents making important cabinet nominations and counting on Congress to confirm them promptly even in the context of a lame duck session, if necessary,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for clk clk says:

    And they claim Obama is a dictator, more like the Koch brothers have become our dictators and have locked us up with their Tea Party. I am not even sure there is a GOP any more, just the despotic party of the extreme right wing,

  2. Because even though you are in the minority, you sonsofbitches think you’re in charge.

  3. Obama is the FREAKING president. He makes appointments and you hold hearings, as well as voting to confirm them. Sounds to me Senator Barrasso, you and the rest of the Republicans don’t want to do YOUR jobs that our tax dollars pay for!

  4. This is amusing: presumption that the Senate is gonna flip. I hope somebody asks that greasy little punk Barrasso about this prediction on Nov 5.

  5. Sanctimonious prick. No Barrasso…you are NOT President and you don’t get to ‘decide’. Kiss my rosey red.

Continue the discussion at

89 more replies


Avatar for clk Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for slbinva Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for sysprog Avatar for Diogenes67 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for tcinla Avatar for opinionated1 Avatar for boscobrown Avatar for tetrisd Avatar for sylhines Avatar for dudeman Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for theyallstink16 Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for baffie2 Avatar for wargreymon2013 Avatar for captaincommonsense Avatar for jimgroom Avatar for hallam Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for muninn

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: