We’ve gotten a lot of really thoughtful (and agitated) reader responses to my earlier post on whether David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel are tone deaf politically on the AIG bonuses mess (my question was narrower: what’s the political up-side for the White House of downplaying the bonuses — but readers took that question and ran with it). We’ve posted the best ones.
LATEST
Where Things Stand
Trump Lackeys Forced to Face the Public on Trump’s Blatantly Corrupt Slush Fund
05.19.26 | 6:03 pm
News
DOJ’s ‘Anti-Weaponization’ Slush Fund Creates a ‘Profound Loophole’ in the Congressional Appropriations Process
05.19.26 | 1:27 pm
News
Trump Finally Endorses Paxton over Cornyn in Texas Senate Primary
05.19.26 | 12:33 pm
Morning Memo
Picking Through the Wreckage From the Worst Day of Trump II So Far
05.19.26 | 10:59 am