Will Speaker Ryan’s First Big Test Be A Shutdown Fight Over Syrian Refugees?

In this photo taken June 9, 2015, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., answers questions during an interview with The Associated Press in his office on Capitol Hill in Washington. First, give pr... In this photo taken June 9, 2015, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., answers questions during an interview with The Associated Press in his office on Capitol Hill in Washington. First, give presidents the power to strike trade deals. Then overturn President Barack Obama’s health care law, overhaul the tax code and reform welfare. And someday? Figure out whether to run for president. Call it the New Ryan Plan, a map not just to big changes in the nation’s fiscal policy, but to Paul Ryan’s future. It points the ninth-term congressman and chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee away from the presidential campaign trail and into the thicket of policy that he says will set the country on better financial footing. The path likely emerges at a familiar decision point _ whether to run for president _ somewhere down the road. Ryan, 45, says he might decide to take that step, someday. (AP Photo/Molly Riley) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Hopes that Paul Ryan would avoid a shutdown fight in the initial months of his speakership are now in jeopardy with the escalating hysteria over the resettlement of Syrian refugees.

Since the Paris attacks that took the lives of more than 100 civilians, lawmakers have ramped up their attacks on the program, which already was the target of Republican opposition. The issue is quick becoming the latest litmus test for politicians to prove their conservative bonafides. More than a dozen governors — most of them Republican — said Monday their states did not wish to participate in the federal refugee resettlement program for Syrians.

But it’s not just Obama who has been receiving the criticism for his plan to take in 10,000 Syrian refugees in the next fiscal year. Now the pressure is growing on Ryan to do what he can to halt the program.

The race is now on for GOP leadership in the House and Senate to figure out how to attack the refugee program in a way that will appease conservatives. The question will be whether standalone efforts to change or limit the program will be enough. Or if the already heated political rhetoric will give rise to yet another threat of a government shutdown if Obama does not cede to Republican demands.

Earlier this fall Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) introduced a bill to suspend the U.S.’s refugee program, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) — who is also running for the 2016 GOP nom — reintroduced Monday his own bill to put new restrictions on visa issuance program for refuges. But those bills would meet an easy veto by the President, making attaching the issue to the ongoing appropriations process all the more tempting.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-TK) suggested just that, in a letter Monday to the Appropriations Committee, requesting language be added to the upcoming spending bill that would require the President to get Congress’ separate approval to receive funding for his refugee program.

On the House side, Budget Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-GA) issued a statement Monday that said the U.S. “must suspend our refugee program until certainty is brought to the vetting process.” Meanwhile, Reps. Jeff Duncan (R-SC) and Babin explicitly called for measures blocking funding for the refugee program to be attached to December’s spending legislation.

Though a deal to set a topline number on next year’s budget was pushed through before Ryan took over the speaker’s gavel, Congress is still sorting through the thorny appropriations legislation that establishes where that funding goes — and that includes towards the President’s refugee resettlement program. The deadline for passing that legislation is Dec. 11.

“I can’t imagine the Republicans letting this go in the midst of a heated campaign,” said Stan Collender — an executive vice president at Qorvis MSL Group and Congressional budget expert — in an interview Monday with TPM.

He compared knee-jerk reaction to the Paris attacks to the backlash prompted by the Planned Parenthood “sting” videos earlier this year, which almost brought about a shutdown in October over the organization’s federal funding.

“It’s exactly the kind of emotional issue that — like Planned Parenthood — could really gum up all the work on appropriations,” Collender said. “It’s the kind of thing that the House will almost certainly vote to exclude the money, the Senate is not clear, and then the president would veto it, and then you would have a showdown come close to midnight on December 11.”

The President has stood firm in his defense of the refugee program, saying Monday, “We do not close our hearts to these victims of such violence and somehow start equating the issue of refugees with the issue of terrorism.”

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) — the chairman of House Freedom Caucus, which has been the root of House leaders’ problems — told Breitbart he received no guarantee from Ryan that the refugee program would be curbed in exchange for the caucus’ support of his speakership. But he signaled the 40-or-so members of the Freedom Caucus were already preparing to oppose the expected omnibus spending bill.

“If the Freedom Caucus makes a stand, I don’t think Ryan has any choice but to do what they want at least the first time around,” Collender said, meaning give them some sort of vote on defunding the refugee program.

According to a Politico report, Ryan and the leadership team are still mulling their next steps. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) had already been in touch with several committee chairs to discuss how to respond to the security concerns raised by the Paris attacks, and the refugee issue is expected to come up when House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-KY) hosts closed door meetings this week to answer members’ questions about the ongoing appropriations process, Politico reported.

Ryan himself has not taken off the table targeting the the refugee program in the upcoming the spending bills, telling radio host Bill Bennett on Monday that Republicans were “trying to figure out what is the best legislative option.”

“We’ve got to make sure we’re protecting ourselves,” Ryan said. “So that’s what we’re looking at. What is the best option — not just so we have an issue to talk about but so we have a result, which is to make sure we are not complicit or even facilitating of having someone come in who would seek to do us harm from Syria.”

Late update: Ryan said at Tuesday’s House leadership conference that a task force had been assembled to come up with legislation “to take a pause” and develop “a more comprehensive strategy” in regards to the Syrian refugee program.

“We think it’s simply prudent that for this particular program, in this particular situation, that we be better guarded against any possible infiltration of ISIS coming through this program,” he said.

He also gently pushed off the idea that Republicans will use December’s spending bill to attempt to block Obama’s program.

“We don’t want to wait that long. We want to work and act on this faster than that,” he said.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. the whip up of hysteria over taking in refugees, from a situation directly traceable back to a previous President’s decisions, sounds to me like the same hysteria that was whipped up over the ‘Ebola Crisis’ or the moral outrage over the phony Planned Parenthood video…

    any bets on what the next Republican outrage will be after this one dies down?

  2. I find it interesting that NOWHERE in this discussion are the GOPers actually proposing anything even remotely constructive toward the issue of the US helping and/or accepting refugees in need.

    If the issue is that they’re concerned that the screening process is not up to their standards (whatever the heck that might be), then instead of killing the program, WHY NOT FUND IT to the point where the screenings will be up to what they believe is an appropriate level? Why not fix it?

    That in and of itself is sufficient to shut the GOPers down on this panic attack and call them out for what they truly are: incredibly stupid raging xenophobic bigots.

  3. The terrorists are getting three for one from the Paris attacks, the killing of innocent civilians, the punishing of the refugees who are fleeing them,and making America look so weak and cowardly in the eyes of the world they will abandon their principles,and the people who need them at the first sign of trouble. The last two The GOP are handing them on a silver platter.

  4. ISIL

    ISIL and this zombie belief that the president is either a sympathizer, a Muslim or both.

  5. JEB! Can fix it.

    But seriously, they are the party of breaking things, so they refuse to offer constructive suggestions.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

60 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lockheedkeynesian Avatar for fgs Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for blandsten Avatar for pickwick Avatar for leftflank Avatar for clemmers Avatar for sandyh Avatar for inversion Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for johnscotus Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for darcy Avatar for canadian Avatar for dickweed Avatar for jcblues Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for dnl Avatar for darrtown Avatar for chezzer14 Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for Landshark2995

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: