U.S. Diplomat To Poland Apologizes For FBI Director’s Holocaust Comments

U.S. Ambassador Stephen Mull attends ceremonies marking the 72nd anniversary of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, in front of the monument to the Heroes of the Ghetto, in Warsaw, Poland, on Sunday, April 19, 2015. A few hu... U.S. Ambassador Stephen Mull attends ceremonies marking the 72nd anniversary of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, in front of the monument to the Heroes of the Ghetto, in Warsaw, Poland, on Sunday, April 19, 2015. A few hundred Jews at the ghetto rose with arms on April 19, 1943 against the Nazi forces who began to transport hundreds of thousands of ghetto residents to the Majdanek death camp. Later Sunday, Mull was summoned to Polandís Foreign Ministry, which protested recent words by FBI director, James Comey, who alleged that the Poles were accomplices of the Germans in the Holocaust. (AP Photo/Czarek Sokolowski) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Obama did it, now the FBI director has done it, and each time it has caused huge offense to a U.S. ally: using language to suggest that Poles were accomplices in the Holocaust.

Poles were waiting to see if FBI director James Comey would issue an apology — something that hadn’t happened by late Monday. Polish Foreign Minister Grzegorz Schetyna said he expected him to say sorry so the matter can be settled.

Comey said last week, “In their minds, the murderers and accomplices of Germany, and Poland, and Hungary, and so many, many other places didn’t do something evil.

“They convinced themselves it was the right thing to do, the thing they had to do. That’s what people do. And that should truly frighten us.”

Comey’s comments are particularly offensive to Poles not only because they had no role in running Auschwitz and other death camps where Jews were murdered during World War II, but because they were themselves victims of the Third Reich. In all, 6 million Polish citizens were killed during the war, about half of them Jewish and the other half Christians, with many Polish priests, members of the intelligentsia and political resistance killed in Auschwitz and elsewhere.

Poland also had a committed anti-Nazi resistance movement and Polish fighters fought alongside the Allies throughout the war. Poles see themselves as heroes of the war who have never been properly recognized, making comments like Comey’s hurt even more.

Comey originally delivered the remarks on Wednesday at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in arguing for the importance of Holocaust education. The speech was adapted for an article published in The Washington Post on Thursday.

So far, there has been no reaction to Comey’s words from the government of Hungary, which did collaborate with the Nazis for most of the war.

But the Polish reaction was swift.

On Sunday, the U.S. ambassador to Poland, Stephen Mull, was called to the Foreign Ministry in a formal act of protest. Mull, a well-liked figure in Poland, went into damage-control mode.

“Saying that Poland and any other country other than Nazi Germany were responsible for the Holocaust is a mistake, is harmful and is offensive,” Mull said. “Director Comey certainly did not mean to suggest that Poland was in any way responsible for those crimes.”

In Washington, U.S. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf later echoed that sentiment, saying that “Poles certainly bore a huge brunt of the barbarism of Nazi Germany.”

“Director Comey certainly did not intend to suggest otherwise, did not intend to suggest that Poland was in some way responsible for the Holocaust,” she said.

The FBI had no immediate comment on the matter.

Polish leaders all had something to say about the controversy.

“To those who are incapable of presenting the historic truth in an honest way, I want to say that Poland was not a perpetrator but a victim of World War II,” Prime Minister Ewa Kopacz said Sunday. “I would expect full historical knowledge from officials who speak on the matter.”

Not all Poles behaved heroically during the war. Anti-Semitism was deep in the 1930s and some Poles pointed Jews out to the Nazis, who often could not tell Jew from non-Jew. There were also some cases of Poles murdering Jews during the war.

But collaborating was never the official state position, as it was with Vichy France, for instance. In fact, during the war, the Polish underground army had a program to save Jews, called Zegota. And Poles caught denouncing Jews to the Nazis were even killed by the Polish resistance.

President Barack Obama caused a similar controversy in 2012 when he used the wording “Polish death camp.” Poles feel that that wording implies Polish complicity, and Obama later expressed “regret” for the gaffe.

“In referring to ‘a Polish death camp’ rather than ‘a Nazi death camp in German-occupied Poland,’ I inadvertently used a phrase that has caused many Poles anguish over the years and that Poland has rightly campaigned to eliminate from public discourse around the world,” Obama wrote at the time. “I regret the error and agree that this moment is an opportunity to ensure that this and future generations know the truth.”

___

Associated Press writers Matthew Lee and Eric Tucker in Washington contributed to this report.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest World News

Notable Replies

  1. Sorry, but the story is not as black-and-white as the Polish government insists. Take for example the historical account of how the entire Jewish community of Jedwabne being murdered on July 10, 1941 not by the Nazis, as was once asserted by official Polish history, but by their Polish neighbors.

    Perhaps the AP might want to also read Poland’s Holocaust: Ethnic Strife, Collaboration with Occupying Forces and Genocide in the Second Republic, 1918-1947 and include a little more context in to this ongoing struggle for Poland to come to terms with the complex, and troubling milieu of anti-Semitism before, during and after the war and the not so clean lines of demarcation between victim, bystander and perpetrator that people want to neatly sweep history into said specified categories.

    Such inclusion might help better inform the reader of the complex nature of the issues at hand, and not simply reporting it as a mindless “gaffe” reportage narrative.

  2. The Teabaggers would complain but they agree with the notion that the Poles deserved it.

  3. Well said. I don’t think the director meant to imply that all Germans, all Poles, and all Hungarians were complicit. That is clearly not the case. But for the Polish government to insist on a very one-sided history is a bit revisionist, to put it mildly.
    I’m reminded of some Germans in the DDR after the war and the war crimes trials erecting monuments highlighting their (now Communist) struggle against the Nazis. It was if the Iron Curtain and the blanket of Communism absolved all those in the East of Nazi complicity, by the simple fact that they were now Communists.

  4. The virulent raging anti-semitism in early twentieth century Poland is an established Historical fact, and stands by itself without reference to any collaboration with Nazis. We’re fluffing up a mole hill here.

  5. W. Shirer’s Rise and Fall goes into some detail on this subject as well.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

6 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for calgacus1 Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for jimolson Avatar for karldean Avatar for bigmitch Avatar for ba_al Avatar for clauscph

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: