North Carolina Man Pleads Guilty To Pulling Off Woman’s Hijab On Flight

FILE- In this April 23, 2015, file photo, a Southwest Airlines jet takes off from a runway at Love Field in Dallas. Southwest Airlines reports financial results Thursday, April 21, 2016. (AP Photo/LM Otero, File)

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — A North Carolina man has pleaded guilty to a federal misdemeanor charge after authorities say he grabbed a Muslim woman’s hijab on a Southwest Airlines flight in December and pulled it off.

Federal authorities say 37-year-old Gill Parker Payne, of Gastonia, North Carolina, entered the plea Friday. He was charged with using force or threat of force to obstruct a Muslim woman in the free exercise of her religious beliefs.

The two were on a Dec. 11 flight from Chicago to Albuquerque when the confrontation happened.

Authorities say Payne approached the woman, who was sitting several rows in front of him, and told her to take off her hijab — an Islamic-style headscarf — saying, “This is America!” He then removed the hijab from her head.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

23
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for docd docd says:

    That is appalling. I would have expected a more serious charge. If a man walked up to an Anglo woman and removed a piece of clothing it would probably be considered sexual assault. (Or so I would hope.)

  2. Gill Parker Payne

    Again, this is why I didn’t give my son a middle name. :wink:

    @docd - I don’t know about sexual assault, but it seems pretty clearly an assault.

    ETA: and certainly a hate crime.

    Lawyers?

  3. What an asshole!

  4. On one point, and only one point, parker was correct. “This is America”, you know, where we have religious freedom as stated in our Constitution… freedom to worship. Asshat with minimal understanding of the Constitution or American values

  5. This is a federal charge. There is no general federal statute against assault, only for assaulting federal employees while engaged in or on account of their official duties. Assault is generally prosecuted by state authorities. This is probably about the only thing the feds could charge him with. For a state to prosecute, there would have to be a determination of which particular state has jurisdiction.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

17 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for pearlywhite Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for clemmers Avatar for renatastar Avatar for 59gibson Avatar for labman57 Avatar for texasaggie Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for boidster Avatar for jimmy_tx Avatar for go2goal Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for tao Avatar for arbalest Avatar for cincypix Avatar for docd Avatar for 10000cranes

Continue Discussion