Ex-Staffer For Jackson Lee Sues Due To Alleged Retaliation For Rape Accusation

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas speaks to reporters after national security officials briefed lawmakers at the Capitol on the situation in Syria, Thursday, Sept. 5, 2013, on Capitol Hill in Washington. President Bar... Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas speaks to reporters after national security officials briefed lawmakers at the Capitol on the situation in Syria, Thursday, Sept. 5, 2013, on Capitol Hill in Washington. President Barack Obama has requested congressional authorization of military intervention in Syria in response to last month's alleged sarin gas attack in the Syrian civil war. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A former staffer for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) has filed a lawsuit alleging that the congresswoman fired her due to her intent to bring a sexual assault allegation against a former employee of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation.

Jackson Lee’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

According to a Wednesday Buzzfeed News report, the former staffer (anonymous in the filing) says that she was raped in October 2015 when she was an intern for the CBCF by Damien Jones, then the intern coordinator.

“Jane Doe,” as she’s called in the lawsuit, reported the alleged assault to the police, but did not press charges at the time. She also told officials at CBCF who said that Jones would be placed on leave — he does seem to have left the foundation at that time.

Three years later, when Jane Doe went to work for Jackson Lee’s office, she found out that Jones also was being considered for hiring. At that point, the she decided to go forward with legal action against him, and the matter was brought to Jackson Lee’s attention.

Jackson Lee reportedly cancelled a scheduled meeting with Jane Doe and soon after fired her for “budget” reasons.

Jane Doe’s lawsuit names both Jackson Lee and the CBCF.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Will Kirsten Gillibrand throw her to the wolves the way she did Al Franken?

    Sorry Kirsten, but that alone is why I’m not going to vote for or support you.

  2. Based on the very limited amount of information presented, the lady has a solid case and, like always in these situations, the cover-up looks very bad.

  3. If the allegations are true, we see–again–that discrimination, particularly sex discrimination, cuts across traditional political categories.

  4. It looks bad but it creates questions.
    didn’t press charges 3 years ago for rape
    decides now to move forward with a lawsuit because of a dismissal for obvious reasons.
    She should have canned his butt 3 years ago and he wouldn’t have been in the position to be considered for the job in the first place.
    just my opinion.

  5. The ‘cover up’? Not responding is a ‘cover up’? It seems that all the allegations are on the ex-staffer’s side but nothing has been done. Am I missing something?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

5 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for sysprog Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for hippocritic Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for birdford

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: