WASHINGTON (AP) — The police officer who fatally shot an unarmed 18-year-old in a St. Louis suburb last summer has told investigators that he was pinned in his vehicle and in fear for his life as they struggled over his gun, The New York Times reported.
Ferguson, Missouri, police officer Darren Wilson has told authorities that Michael Brown reached for the gun during a scuffle, the Times reported in a story posted on its website Friday night. The officer’s account to authorities did not explain why he fired at Brown multiple times after emerging from his vehicle, according to the newspaper.
The Times reported that the account of Wilson’s version of events came from government officials briefed on the federal civil rights investigation into the Aug. 9 shooting that sparked racial unrest and weeks of protests, some of which turned violent. Wilson is white and Brown black.
Wilson confronted Brown and a friend while they were walking back to Brown’s home from a convenience store. After the shooting, Brown died at the scene. Some witnesses have told authorities and news media that Brown had his hands raised when Wilson approached with his weapon and fired repeatedly. An independent autopsy commissioned by the family says that Brown was shot at least six times, including twice in the head.
Benjamin Crump, the attorney for Brown’s parents, told The Associated Press on Saturday that the officer’s account of what happened was “self-serving.”
“The officer is going to say whatever he has to say to try to justify killing an unarmed teenager,” Crump said. “And certainly, his statement should not be taken above independent eye witnesses who are completely unbiased when he has every reason to be biased.”
Crump also said that because there were reports that Michael Brown was shot while he ran away, it “doesn’t matter” what happened in the car beforehand.
“He was definitely not in fear of threat when Michael Brown was running away from him,” Crump said.
The Times reported that Wilson has told investigators that he was trying to leave his SUV when Brown pushed him back in and that once inside the vehicle the two began to fight. Wilson told authorities that Brown punched and scratched him repeatedly, leaving swelling on his face and cuts on his neck, the Times reported.
Wilson, who had been patrolling Ferguson for nearly three years, was placed on leave after the shooting. A state grand jury is considering charges against him.
Wilson is being represented by James P. Towey, general counsel for the Missouri Fraternal Order of Police and a former general counsel for the St. Louis Police Officers Association. Towey didn’t immediately respond to an email Saturday seeking comment, and his work phone system wasn’t accepting voicemail.
The Justice Department is investigating the Ferguson Police Department for possible civil rights violations, including whether officers there use excessive force and engage in discriminatory practices. Two-thirds of Ferguson’s 21,000 residents are black but only three of its more than 50 police officers are black.
Brian Schellman, a spokesman for St. Louis County Police, which has taken control of Ferguson security, said in an email that the department doesn’t comment on active investigations.
Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Sorry, Darren Wilson.
If as you say Michael Brown reached for your gun: then your gun must have already been drawn out of your right side holster and directed toward him. You were going to shoot him for jaywalking and having the audacity to talk to you.
If your gun was holstered on your right hand side, no one could reach in far enough to withdraw it.
Even if this officer had a moment of fear while inside his car, he didn’t shoot Michael Brown from his car. Why did he get out of the car, chase the individual he claimed to be afraid of, and shoot him multiple times in the street? It’s not even close to a believable description of what happened.
Why? I’m not taking sides either way here, want to see more evidence. But why would his gun need to be drawn for Brown to reach for it? Also, we had just seen Brown shove someone on video after robbing their store, and most witnesses said there was a scuffle with Brown reaching into the car. Brown was obviously feeling pretty rowdy and violent. Still not proof he deserved to be shot, but certainly that is relevant.
Feared for his life? Hmmm. If he didn’t then, I’m guessing he does, now…
Brown would have been reaching around the LEO to his right hip. That’s both of the cops arms and his torso in the way of anyone tiring to disarm him. Through a car window.
Brown would have to have been half of the way inside the cruiser. It just makes no kinesthetic sense.