Bergdahl Faces Up To Life In Prison At Sentencing Hearing Monday

FILE - In this Jan. 12, 2016, file photo, Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl arrives for a pretrial hearing at Fort Bragg, N.C. Bergdahl, who was held captive by the Taliban for half a decade after walking away from his Afghan... FILE - In this Jan. 12, 2016, file photo, Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl arrives for a pretrial hearing at Fort Bragg, N.C. Bergdahl, who was held captive by the Taliban for half a decade after walking away from his Afghanistan post, is expected to plead guilty this month rather than face trial for desertion and misbehavior before the enemy, two individuals with knowledge of the case said. (AP Photo/Ted Richardson, File) MORE LESS

FORT BRAGG, N.C. (AP) — Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl will appear Monday before a military judge who will determine his punishment for endangering comrades by walking off his post in Afghanistan. Before delivering his sentence, the judge will have to resolve a last-minute defense argument that new comments by President Donald Trump have tainted the case.

Bergdahl faces up to life in prison after pleading guilty last week to desertion and misbehavior before the enemy. Prosecutors made no deal to cap his punishment, so the judge has wide leeway to decide his sentence after a hearing expected to take several days.

The judge, Army Col. Jeffery R. Nance, is expected to weigh factors including Bergdahl’s willingness to admit guilt, his five years of captivity in the hands of the Taliban and its allies, and the serious wounds that several service members suffered while searching for him.

Prosecutors are expected to put on evidence or testimony about soldiers and a Navy SEAL who were seriously wounded by gunfire during these search missions, including an Army National Guard sergeant who was shot in the head, suffering a traumatic brain injury that put him in a wheelchair, unable to speak.

Bergdahl, 31, from Hailey, Idaho, was captured soon after walking off his remote post in 2009. He has said he was caged, kept in darkness and beaten, and tried to escape more than a dozen times. He said his intention had been to alert other commanders to what he saw as problems with his unit. Still, when he pleaded guilty, he told the judge that his actions were inexcusable.

President Barack Obama brought Bergdahl home in 2014 in a swap for five Taliban prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, saying the U.S. does not leave its service members on the battlefield. Republicans roundly criticized Obama, and Trump went further while campaigning for president, repeatedly calling Bergdahl a “dirty, rotten traitor” who deserved to be executed by firing squad or thrown out of a plane without a parachute.

Nance ruled in February that those campaign statements were “disturbing and disappointing,” but didn’t amount to unlawful command influence, noting that Trump made the comments before he became president.

Defense lawyers argued last week that Trump’s views haven’t changed as commander in chief, citing his reaction to Bergdahl’s guilty plea. Trump told reporters he couldn’t say anything more about the case, “but I think people have heard my comments in the past.”

The White House issued a statement Friday that, without mentioning Bergdahl by name, said any military justice case must be “resolved on its own facts.” Prosecutors cited that statement in opposing the latest defense arguments.

12
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The prosecution is expected to bring up that some potential rescuers may have been severely injured. Hannity and Fox
    said like 20 guys were killed looking for him. Which is it?

  2. My big issue is was he fully aware what he was doing? I mean, I almost feel like being there fucked with his mind and he may have actually been trying to end his life at that point. I always bring this up, just because it’s my only experience with someone temporarily insane, but my wife did some things she’d never have done before and has never done since, a month or so after the birth of our 4th kid. The mind can get temporarily get fucked up, and then sometimes come back.

  3. Q: Has any US soldier ever faced a life sentence for desertion in our history?
    A: From Wikipedia (because I’m lazy today):wink:

    Penalties
    In the United States, before the Civil War, deserters from the Army were flogged; after 1861, tattoos or branding were also used. The maximum U.S. penalty for desertion in wartime remains death, although this punishment was last applied to Eddie Slovik in 1945. No U.S. serviceman has received more than 24 months imprisonment for desertion or missing movement post-September 11, 2001.[45]

    Just saying…

  4. While there would be some level of moral hazard to leave his behavior unpunished. Anything more than dishonorable discharge and something equivalent to “sentenced to 5 yrs, time already served” would be cruel.

  5. That was before we had a cruel and unusual president…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

6 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for heirball Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for jinnj Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for tiowally Avatar for abogado Avatar for evave2

Continue Discussion